Author Topic: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.  (Read 3845 times)

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5580
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2012, 08:44:00 AM »
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point

So Paul Broderick didn't wear it with pride? Didn't deserve to wear it?

How many years ago did Brodders wear it? Perhaps daniel never saw him.. ;) ;D

BTW Maurice wasn't captain either.

I think Broderick's, from memory, number was 17 anyway.

 :thumbsup

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5580
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2012, 08:55:04 AM »
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point

So Paul Broderick didn't wear it with pride? Didn't deserve to wear it?

Don't think Paul was ever captain.

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8417
  • In Absentia
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2012, 09:32:04 AM »
In the future, all captains will wear 9
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4482
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2012, 11:34:46 AM »
I agree, no disrespect to Jack Dyer but this was always a stupid concept and should be dumped whenever the next captain comes along.

Most players would prefer to keep their original number I would think

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2012, 11:41:50 AM »
In all seriousness, Chimp has stated before that nothing would make him prouder than wearing the #17 – a few players have.

It's history and symbolism obviously means something to the playing group, even if it doesn't to the ferals, and I guess that's all that really matters.

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13181
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2012, 12:31:26 PM »
In all seriousness, Chimp has stated before that nothing would make him prouder than wearing the #17 – a few players have.

It's history and symbolism obviously means something to the playing group, even if it doesn't to the ferals, and I guess that's all that really matters.

Hear hear let Cotch do the number justice

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2012, 12:44:11 PM »
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point

So Paul Broderick didn't wear it with pride? Didn't deserve to wear it?

Ooh im sorry i didn't realize Broders was captain? Kane Johnson though gee wiz how inspirational was he with his 20 metre set shot behinds. Please give me a spell

I'm in favour of players wearing 17 but why does it have to be the captain. Its complete BS.

whether your 17 or 70 u should wear the jumper with pride. Enter Steve Morris and Tuck. Those are players i really enjoy watching. Not gifted with talent but give it their all and within the rules not like spud Jackson

Cotch stays at 9. Old school leather face mentality don't need it
since when was Rioli captain?  :lol
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2012, 01:22:04 PM »
In the future, all captains will wear 9

With due respect to Cotch (and the late, great Jack), I would hope every skipper following whoever gets to wear whatever number they are issued initially.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2012, 02:24:02 PM »
Wgaf
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13591
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2012, 03:08:10 PM »
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point

So Paul Broderick didn't wear it with pride? Didn't deserve to wear it?

Ooh im sorry i didn't realize Broders was captain? Kane Johnson though gee wiz how inspirational was he with his 20 metre set shot behinds. Please give me a spell

I'm in favour of players wearing 17 but why does it have to be the captain. Its complete BS.

whether your 17 or 70 u should wear the jumper with pride. Enter Steve Morris and Tuck. Those are players i really enjoy watching. Not gifted with talent but give it their all and within the rules not like spud Jackson

Cotch stays at 9. Old school leather face mentality don't need it
since when was Rioli captain?  :lol

Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers. When was the concept introduced Martello? to give 17 only to captains

Since about 2001 from memory. When did Rioli play or Broderick play?

I said  the number should be worn by ANYONE who is fitting.

Sugar and Newman. Yep great inspirational leaders they are



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #25 on: August 14, 2012, 03:16:52 PM »
Quote
I said  the number should be worn by ANYONE who is fitting. 
:lol
thats not what you said;
Quote
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli
is what you said.

When WP pointed out that broddo did the number proud your smug retort was
Quote
Ooh im sorry i didn't realize Broders was captain?
as if it was wp that was the fool.
 :lol
The world according to daniel is one messed up illogical place.

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2012, 04:14:56 PM »
FWIW I like the concept, have from the start.  It's something that we started as a club and sets us apart from others (I think Port may have followed by using #1 but I may be mistaken).  We all bemoan players that don't appear to play for 'the jumper' in this professional arena yet frown upon trying to create a sense of pride and tradition with our captain's number.  Go figure.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13591
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #27 on: August 14, 2012, 04:19:11 PM »
 
true i said "im in favour of anyone who wears 17 but why the captain", and not  "the number should be worn by anyone who is fitting". uum who gives a flying f.ark how i wrote it. The meaning is the same you twit. No wonder the world is gone so correct with the likes of you living in it.

pretty sure WP can defend himself but continue on being a little teenager








Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #28 on: August 14, 2012, 04:33:02 PM »
 :lol
perhaps if you said what you mean rather than expect people to translate stupidity into something sensible

funny little mixed up boy.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7323
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #29 on: August 14, 2012, 04:35:28 PM »
In all seriousness, Chimp has stated before that nothing would make him prouder than wearing the #17 – a few players have.

It's history and symbolism obviously means something to the playing group, even if it doesn't to the ferals, and I guess that's all that really matters.
More than good enough for me