Operating Loss at Punt Rd for 2016

[(•))(©™]

No. we LOOK like a stable.

[🏅Dooks]

No. we LOOK like a stable.

RFC. Perceptions not premierships TM

[Raoul Duke]

Hardwick met his KPI's & got a raise?

[Chuck17]

Hardwick met his KPI's & got a raise?

Yes has developed the best list since he has been at the club

[Diocletian]

The best list since the worst list since Fitzroy.....

[Yeahright]

So we are giving free advertising to ME Bank?  That's nice of us.

Left it up in the hope they'll come back to us.

[The Machine]

Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.

Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.

[Ivan]

Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.

Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.

Rumours of 2m loss

800k negative doesn't look so bad?

[The Machine]

Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.

Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.

Rumours of 2m loss

800k negative doesn't look so bad?

800k?....it was 80k

[WilliamPowell]

Not a great result and not the modest profit i was told some weeks ago but far from the rumored 2m loss.

Never the less we have some work to do both on and off field if we are to become a serious player in the comp.

Rumours of 2m loss

800k negative doesn't look so bad?

its an $80,000 loss not $800,000  

huge difference don't you think

[taztiger4]

all things considered that is an acceptable result
BLK going under - $300k
No PRO Naming sponsor - $500 k ??
poor on field attendance - $100k a game ? 1.1m

[Beans]

Would have made over $200k profit if it wasn't for $300k writedowns of bad debts.

[WilliamPowell]

all things considered that is an acceptable result
BLK going under - $300k
No PRO Naming sponsor - $500 k ??
poor on field attendance - $100k a game ? 1.1m

BLK who are in receivership not closed would not have any impact on this year's result. The events have happened today, that is only advised ASICS today so cannot be in our 2016 result as it has happened after clubs find year end

The $300k sponsorship bad debt would be Metro Solar and someone else

Naming rights to PRO would be over a million.  For memory with ME Bank it was around the $1mil to $1.5mil a year

Match date revenues I agree would be around  $1 million-plus to $1.5 mil and that's conservative

Dont think it is acceptable to make a loss but certainly could have been alot of worse