Author Topic: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...  (Read 2793 times)

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« on: September 07, 2014, 06:31:48 PM »
Newman - as big a Finals specialist as he is, he's a barometer for mediocrity.
In juniors one would relish a one on one with such a dud,

Grigg - Soft, outside, outsider footballer.
Such character goes missing, as in today

Morris -  Tries his guts out but only has 50% skill level

Conca - just an idiot
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17932
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2014, 06:45:44 PM »
Newman needs to do the right thing and change his mind.

Grigg can go rack 'em up in the reserves for a year until we can delist him. Nobody would want him.


Morris is a liability and has been for a few years. Let him emulate his old man's career by going to Collingwood and swap him for Goldsack.

Conca should be traded back to WA before they wake up to him. Becoming a Tamblingesque draft blunder.

Shankwards was exposed again today under real pressure - trade while he's worth something. (won't happen, but should)

Houli - see Grigg.

Chaplin, another with no value that we're saddled with -see Houli & Grigg.

Petterd - at best depth defensive medium forward who should never play behind the ball ever -and probably not on it that much either truth be told. I've always defended him but at the end of the day - don't really care either way if he's delisted.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2014, 06:48:19 PM »
Who did Grigg play on today?

Was it Wingard?
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2014, 06:49:16 PM »
Nobody...
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline DCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
  • Belle, Richmond PR manager
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2014, 07:07:03 PM »
Newman needs to do the right thing and change his mind.

Grigg can go rack 'em up in the reserves for a year until we can delist him. Nobody would want him.


Morris is a liability and has been for a few years. Let him emulate his old man's career by going to Collingwood and swap him for Goldsack.

Conca should be traded back to WA before they wake up to him. Becoming a Tamblingesque draft blunder.

Shankwards was exposed again today under real pressure - trade while he's worth something. (won't happen, but should)

Houli - see Grigg.

Chaplin, another with no value that we're saddled with -see Houli & Grigg.

Petterd - at best depth defensive medium forward who should never play behind the ball ever -and probably not on it that much either truth be told. I've always defended him but at the end of the day - don't really care either way if he's delisted.

Pretty much the exact thoughts that I had after the game.

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2014, 07:08:34 PM »
Chaplin is fine when the coach does his job.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2014, 07:11:55 PM »
He is not. he's a liability. A stooge.

Rance needs to do two people work weekly
« Last Edit: September 08, 2014, 08:31:57 AM by Judge Roughneck »

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4842
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2014, 07:39:47 PM »
Chaplin was shocking today, worst on ground
He's not a leaders arse, leaders lead men this guys couldn't s lease a horse to water.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2014, 07:45:06 PM »


Carried thru his 250th and beyond.
Caracella and Balmey.

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13177
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2014, 10:24:36 PM »
Chaplin was shocking today, worst on ground
He's not a leaders arse, leaders lead men this guys couldn't s lease a horse to water.

Could think of a few other worthy contenders for that title

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2014, 10:27:07 PM »


Carried thru his 250th and beyond.
Get used to seeing him a lot more next year.

The coach loves the dude.
Great servant of the club....blah blah blah. 

.....meanwhile youngsters are underdeveloped in the magoos.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2014, 12:19:16 AM »
its always the usual suspects.

They never do a thing about it
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3763
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2014, 12:50:32 AM »
Must say upset about the loss,but in a way it was good reality check for the club how far off we are from the top sides and need to improve and address certain issues.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2014, 08:36:37 AM »
King, jacko, gone.

Newman, a Edwards, hampson, often ashould be gone.

Ditto knights. Or rookie.

Thomas no good

Chaplin big handicap

Grigg terrible

Houli down hill skier

Pettard a nothing player really


---

Hardwick. Fail
Choco looks like he dngaf




Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2014, 08:40:14 AM »
Houli was far from our worse
Lots of people name their swords......