Author Topic: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)  (Read 1009 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95696
    • One-Eyed Richmond
AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs
Cheryl Critchley | March 03, 2009

AFL clubs charging die-hard fans up to $25 for photos with their favourite players have been branded greedy.

Hawthorn slugged fans $25 for a picture with superstars Buddy Franklin, Luke Hodge, Stuart Dew and Cyril Rioli at a recent family day.

Richmond charged $20 for snaps with some of its top stars, while North Melbourne's fee was $10 and Melbourne a gold coin donation.

Collingwood will charge a fee at its March 15 event, but declines to reveal how much.

The clubs say they have to cover their costs, but supporters are upset at having to cough up cash for happy snaps, and several footy legends understand their ire.

Collingwood champ and father of three Peter Daicos said families were doing it tough and many would not be able to afford multiple photos.

"I know how much joy it brings to the kids to get photos with their favourite player," he said yesterday.

"I'd prefer the service to be offered free but . . . they're (AFL clubs) all scampering to try and make a few bob and build their stocks.

"In the end that's just the nature of the beast."

Footy legend Ron Barassi said it was not good for the image of AFL clubs, but the charge helped them stay afloat. "It's the downside of the way of the world," he said.

North Melbourne great Glenn Archer agreed.

"I can see both sides," he said. "Some people would say they pay enough for their membership. Unfortunately . . . it costs $20 million to run a football club these days."

No club yet charges for autographs.

A Richmond fan who didn't want to be named said $20 for a player photo was "outrageous".

"Why should we have to pay for that? It's not like they don't make enough from us as it is," she said.

Collingwood supporter Angie said she had lined up for more than an hour and paid to have her picture taken with Magpie stars. "Everything is so controlled. If it's a family day it's a strange sort of family," she said.

St Kilda, Essendon, Brisbane and Carlton are among clubs that don't charge.

Carlton spokesman Stephen Wilson said family day was free.

"It's about the players so all (of them were) free and available to sign autographs," he said. "It is about the supporters meeting the players."

Essendon provides free professional shots that fans can access on the club website.

"The club wears this fee in order to make a special day that recognises the supporters who support the club each year," spokeswoman Cara Pelchen said.

Brisbane Lions spokesman Sam Lord said apart from a special photo with the whole team, everything on family day was free.

Clubs charging for photos said it was necessary to help cover the costs of producing the professional shots and security, ground hire and

entertainment for the day.

Hawthorn spokesman Clinton Bown said charging for photos helped cover costs.

On bigfooty.com, Hawthorn fans appeared happy to part with their money for a shot with the 2008 Premiership cup. "$25 well spent!" said Blockman155.

Another Hawthorn spokesman said the club also used the 2008 cup to raise money for charity, including the Victorian Bushfire Fund.

Collingwood's Nick Hulett said the fee for a shot with multiple high-profile players was "only to cover costs of the professional photography and is not a profitable exercise for the club".

Mr Hulett said the family day was not profitable.

AFL Cheer Squad League chairman Daniel Peterson, a Kangaroos fan, said he wouldn't pay more than $10 for a photo.

An AFL spokesman said it was up to clubs how they ran family days.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25129868-2862,00.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95696
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2009, 04:18:38 AM »
It was $20 for a shot with Richo, Deledio, Newman, Johnson, Browny, Cotchin, McMahon, Pettifer and Moore according to the Herald-Sun.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2009, 09:26:52 AM »
this has been brought on by the greed of football fans themselves, nagging players constantly at training & where they make other appearances at shopping centres, other venues, & club functions.
Getting photos & having them signed & selling them on ebay & other www sites, then being seen again at training sessions doing the same thing with the same players even sending kids up to get it for them.
This has been monitored by some clubs for the past few seasons
To those who have done this you have only destroyed it for the kids of the future & the general supporter.
most players prefer only to sign photos of themselves with thier fans in the photo so the value is only to that supporter
this is not about clubs trying to get rich, its about nagging fans who repeatedly get photos signed to sell.
l known about this for sometime now & if you back track my posts will see l've mentioned it a few times.

l support all the clubs taking a stance of these Ebay & other www predator sellers

Moi

  • Guest
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2009, 10:19:56 AM »
Bloke rang up 3AW this morning and said he took his kid to family day and had photo taken with Browny which cost hiim $20.  His five year old kid has been sitting by the letterbox waiting for it and it finally came and it wasn't the picture of his kid.  Has rung the club.  They said they would ring back but they haven't.

So RFC, get on the phone to the bloke and fix it.  Bad PR and a stuff up that could go beyond this bloke.  Obviously, the other kid who he got the photo of hasn't got his as well.

Ridiculous paying for pics but that's just my opinion.

Offline Beren

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2009, 11:22:15 AM »
Tiger niece and her friend grumbled about paying $20 to have their photos taken with their fave player...... till they received said photo. It was a professional job and a brilliant photo. This was 3 years ago, if the price is still $20 then it's good value.

I'm not surprised there was a mix up with the numbers that attended at Family Day. It will be sorted I'm sure.
You only hear about the dissatisfied minority.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58063
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2009, 02:38:18 PM »
At training it's all free. Bring your own camera and the players (except Cuz) are happy to have a photo taken with you and sign your jumper.

TM is right. It's the leaches who turn up with a stack of things to sign and then flog them off on ebay that annoys the club and players. A lot of the time now players will sign their signature but then add best wishes Tommy or whatever so it's personalised.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95696
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2009, 07:05:12 PM »
Caro said Richmond is denying the story. The $20 cost was for studio-quality photos which were sent out in the mail. If you had your own camera and asked a player walking around it was free.

3aw had a couple of supporters on complaining. One woman saying the "studio-quality" photo she received was blurry on each side where Newman and Foley were in the photo. A man said he lined up at a tent for an hour to get a photo from Richo but Richo switched tents or left before he got to the front of the queue.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2009, 12:32:39 AM »
Classic case of some people just loving to have a big whinge on their soap box
You poor hard done by souls

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2009, 10:03:45 AM »
Bloke rang up 3AW this morning and said he took his kid to family day and had photo taken with Browny which cost hiim $20.  His five year old kid has been sitting by the letterbox waiting for it and it finally came and it wasn't the picture of his kid.  Has rung the club.  They said they would ring back but they haven't.

So RFC, get on the phone to the bloke and fix it.  Bad PR and a stuff up that could go beyond this bloke.  Obviously, the other kid who he got the photo of hasn't got his as well.

Ridiculous paying for pics but that's just my opinion.


that is a terrible thing to happen, l would be furious

Offline Beren

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: AFL clubs charging fans to take their photographs (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2009, 03:14:33 PM »
Caro said Richmond is denying the story. The $20 cost was for studio-quality photos which were sent out in the mail. If you had your own camera and asked a player walking around it was free.



Told you  ;)
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.