Author Topic: Reece Conca [merged]  (Read 428137 times)

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1620 on: August 07, 2015, 09:47:57 PM »
The problem is there are ten worse players

That aren't worth a cent. He at least is worth something when bundled up

You can see how poor we play when lids isn't playing which is why we need more quality mids and Conca ain't one

Agree

But then you have ten guys that are not better than conca, still

And no conca and one conca replacement

See how the problem is still there?
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Petey

  • Bad
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
  • SgtAA of OER
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1621 on: August 07, 2015, 11:12:44 PM »
he was horrible

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13601
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1622 on: August 07, 2015, 11:38:46 PM »
No I don't see it as I don't have an issue with 10 players only 5 which I have mentioned.

Next crop of chap and batch need to be upgraded only when Hackson  finally starts doing his bloody job.

What amazes me was how some were singing hampshits praises after one average game

Goodbye for the last time I hope

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18057
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1623 on: August 08, 2015, 12:05:25 AM »
The problem is there are ten worse players

That aren't worth a cent. He at least is worth something when bundled up

You can see how poor we play when lids isn't playing which is why we need more quality mids and Conca ain't one

Agree

But then you have ten guys that are not better than conca, still

And no conca and one conca replacement

See how the problem is still there?

Who's saying we have to keep all those others if Conca goes? Alternatively they can go play in the VFL and be depth as C.Ellis, Menadue, Elton, Butler , McBean etc come up.

Either way, if the Conca replacement is better than Conca - that still improves the list, if not necessarily the depth.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1624 on: August 08, 2015, 12:17:37 AM »
The problem is there are ten worse players

That aren't worth a cent. He at least is worth something when bundled up

You can see how poor we play when lids isn't playing which is why we need more quality mids and Conca ain't one

Agree

But then you have ten guys that are not better than conca, still

And no conca and one conca replacement

See how the problem is still there?

Who's saying we have to keep all those others if Conca goes? Alternatively they can go play in the VFL and be depth as C.Ellis, Menadue, Elton, Butler , McBean etc come up.

Either way, if the Conca replacement is better than Conca - that still improves the list, if not necessarily the depth.

History has shown dimma loves his plodder mates
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1625 on: August 08, 2015, 12:46:12 AM »
We lose WITH him.
His tempo forces e erroneous else to speed up.
Useless.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1626 on: August 08, 2015, 01:08:50 AM »
What happened to my back flipping gif from last week? I wanted to bump it :shh

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1627 on: August 08, 2015, 06:25:45 AM »
Trade and do it this year.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

No More

  • Guest
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1628 on: August 08, 2015, 10:45:54 AM »
yep I wanted to see if he could be consistent. he couldn't even do it for 2 weeks running. so its time to send him back to wa at the end of the season.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1629 on: August 08, 2015, 11:44:22 AM »

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18057
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1630 on: August 08, 2015, 11:46:22 AM »
Reece's monkey?
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1631 on: August 08, 2015, 02:44:24 PM »
no worse than ellis, who would have way more trade value, and doesnt get involved in the hard stuff like reece does.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18057
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1632 on: August 08, 2015, 02:52:13 PM »
Trade them both.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1633 on: August 08, 2015, 02:57:15 PM »
no worse than ellis, who would have way more trade value, and doesnt get involved in the hard stuff like reece does.

They're both negatives.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #1634 on: August 08, 2015, 10:07:20 PM »
no worse than ellis, who would have way more trade value, and doesnt get involved in the hard stuff like reece does.

They're both negatives.
We haven't got the balls to trade players like Ellis, Conca or Griff.
I know people will say they need to agree to it but if you let them know their next contract won't be very healthy then I'm sure they will run for the door.
My old mate Blind Freddy can see that they won't get us anywhere.

Our first pick and Ellis for Treloar
Conca for Yarran
Griff for Motlop