'No complaints' from Claw apparently.
be careful sonny im watching.
look it hard to understand that im happy we took two state league players. im actually over the moon we have tried this route. but bloody hell where we take em is important. its where we took em that im critical of. i have little doubt the two lads we took would have been there in the rookie draft.
yes im also critical that we promoted petterd. there should have been absolutely no guarantees that he would be promoted. keep him as a rookie and bloody hell we have been able to target just one other 18 yr old instead of going with just the one we took.
bloody hell how important was it to promote petterd. not very imo. conca, vlastuin, deledio, ellis mcintosh grimes dea, batchelor, houli, morris, newman. plus newbie lennon could and should probably start his career of hb arnot helbig could be tried back there bloody hell how many options do we want. yet we promote one of the worst skilled players on our list and insist on playing him back its laughable.
promoting this hack has literally cost us the chance of useing pick 50 on a kid. and please dont give me the absolute pee weak excuses of there was no good kids to take or give a chance to at pick 50 ffs.
;
