Author Topic: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]  (Read 257971 times)

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1380 on: October 13, 2012, 12:49:27 AM »
Maybe we trade posty for mebournes pick in. The 20's  :shh

Imagine the imposing fwd line they'd have of clark, donkey dawes and post. Throw in watts and I smell a dynasty  :shh
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Big Papa Bear

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1381 on: October 13, 2012, 07:28:04 AM »
After a good start with Knights and Chaplain - we have been very quiet!

Need more than 2 recruits to improve the list. Obviously our trade bait is not attracting any interest. A clear sign that they are duds and just need to be cut.

No depth = another frustrating season

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1382 on: October 13, 2012, 08:30:56 AM »
After a good start with Knights and Chaplain - we have been very quiet!

Need more than 2 recruits to improve the list. Obviously our trade bait is not attracting any interest. A clear sign that they are duds and just need to be cut.

No depth = another frustrating season

Did we not win 10.5 games and lose a handful of games by a handful of points?
We get a Roos like draw next year and finals become much more realistic.
In fact, I would go as far to say the draw is more important that the trade period
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5580
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1383 on: October 13, 2012, 08:54:41 AM »

We are half way through the trade period.

In regard to comensation he AFL states...

Compensation
Clubs will be compensated by way of draft picks if they are deemed to have a net loss in the free agency period. The compensation falls into one of five categories - a first-round pick immediately following the club's first round pick, an end of first-round pick, a second-round pick immediately after the club's second round pick, an end of second-round pick or a third-round pick immediately after the club's third round selection.


My question is when is this comensation decided?

'65

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1384 on: October 13, 2012, 08:58:49 AM »
After a good start with Knights and Chaplain - we have been very quiet!

Need more than 2 recruits to improve the list. Obviously our trade bait is not attracting any interest. A clear sign that they are duds and just need to be cut.

No depth = another frustrating season

Did we not win 10.5 games and lose a handful of games by a handful of points?
We get a Roos like draw next year and finals become much more realistic.
In fact, I would go as far to say the draw is more important that the trade period

Finals, no excuses! Hoping for a good draw to get into finals is already conceding defeat and saying we are not good enough or we don't have the players. Trade period is far more important than the draw, good sides will win anywhere, the Pies, Hawks, Freo, etc..... Have proved that.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5580
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1385 on: October 13, 2012, 09:06:10 AM »


OK the dates below.

I suppose the date highlighted in red would be when the AFL decide on compensation?

This would then leave 3-4 days of trading when the draft order is known.

Can clubs trade their compensation picks?


Here are the key dates around the Player Rules for the exchange process and the 2012 NAB AFL Draft:
 
October 1 – Commencement of Gillette AFL Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency period.
October 5, 2pm – Nomination of Father-Son Eligible Players and Academy Bidding Players.
October 8, 10am – Father-Son Eligible Players and Academy Players Bid Meeting.
October 8 – Commencement of Gillette AFL Trade Period.
October 19, 2pm – Deadline for GWS Giants to pre-list balance of any uncontracted players under List Establishment rules.
October 19, 5pm – Close to Gillette AFL Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency Period.
October 22 - Restricted Free Agency Matching Offer Response Closed
October 23, 5pm – Trade Incentive Rule (17 year-olds) Deadline for Trading.
October 26, 2pm – End of Gillette AFL Trade Period.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5288
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1386 on: October 13, 2012, 11:38:30 AM »
Honeslty, Richmond should not trade for any players.

Be great if we either upgraded our draft picks in some deal.

Maybe trade out Graham, Post, White ...


Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1387 on: October 13, 2012, 12:43:20 PM »
There was a rumour earlier in the week regarding Daniel Rich going to Melbourne for an early pick.

Well if the Post/ Karnezis trade is a goer can we manufacture a situation to involve Daniel Rich in the trade and Post still ending up at Brissy.

Vossy can be enigmatic with the draft.

Rich is a left footer off half back hard at it and can play in the midfield an upgrade on Houli if you ask me. Left footer, Blair loves bringing across left footers.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1388 on: October 13, 2012, 12:45:34 PM »
Rich is an upgrade on a lot guys on our list. Underrated player.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1389 on: October 13, 2012, 12:52:32 PM »
I think he is a great long penetrating kick and uses the ball well.

I think playing at the MCG will suit him and he can slot into our best 22 easily and relegate blokes like Houli as depth players.


Online Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4842
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1390 on: October 13, 2012, 12:54:46 PM »
Rich is an upgrade on a lot guys on our list. Underrated player.

Agree but realistically he wouldn't be cheap. Would be pick 9 minimum and probally someone as steak knives. Is he worth that?

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1391 on: October 13, 2012, 12:58:42 PM »
Rich is an upgrade on a lot guys on our list. Underrated player.

Agree but realistically he wouldn't be cheap. Would be pick 9 minimum and probally someone as steak knives. Is he worth that?

Maybe not TFT the upside is he is only 22, but you're right maybe pick 9 is abit expensive.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1392 on: October 13, 2012, 01:12:13 PM »
After a good start with Knights and Chaplain - we have been very quiet!

Need more than 2 recruits to improve the list. Obviously our trade bait is not attracting any interest. A clear sign that they are duds and just need to be cut.

No depth = another frustrating season

This draft has more depth than the black sea, wise move to hold fire and let our reputed recruiting team do their best work on d day :shh
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1393 on: October 13, 2012, 02:46:42 PM »
After a good start with Knights and Chaplain - we have been very quiet!

Need more than 2 recruits to improve the list. Obviously our trade bait is not attracting any interest. A clear sign that they are duds and just need to be cut.

No depth = another frustrating season

This draft has more depth than the black sea, wise move to hold fire and let our reputed recruiting team do their best work on d day :shh

Agree. Have added a couple of mature bodies but lets keep loading up on young talent.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39044
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #1394 on: October 13, 2012, 04:50:49 PM »

My question is when is this comensation decided?

'65

Compensation picks will determined at the completion of the FA period = end Of next week as per the dates in red on your other posts

That's why some clubs are holding back in trades, want to know the various compo pick numbers to assist with doing other deals.

Think there will be a lot more trade movement in the last week
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)