Author Topic: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]  (Read 47804 times)

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #135 on: June 08, 2012, 08:39:14 AM »
Im with MR Akov is that tabacco on his legs??
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95562
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #136 on: June 08, 2012, 11:32:01 AM »
VIDEO: The big fella @BrettOHanlon is debuting this weekend, get to know him a bit better with this video

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/roarvisionarchive/tabid/11454/contentid/409661/default.aspx

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #137 on: June 08, 2012, 12:59:47 PM »
watched him train at punt rd today, moves well, good kick and size :thumbsup

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #138 on: June 08, 2012, 01:45:13 PM »
Went to a function where I got to sit with him and have a chat after he was first drafted. You always forget how young these kids are. The footage they showed of him was magnificent. He fits Dimma's mantra and is a beautiful kick of the football, takes a nice grab and is a good mover. Just needs to beef up of course. I would imagine he would play as the sub and have him linking up in space when the game opens up later.

Top kid  :thumbsup

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5006
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #139 on: June 08, 2012, 01:50:11 PM »
What are his defficiencies? As in, why was he not taken in the national draft?
Sounds like a ripper.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #140 on: June 08, 2012, 01:58:11 PM »
What are his defficiencies? As in, why was he not taken in the national draft?
Sounds like a ripper.

A little slow. Nothing too bad though. Probably his midfield potential as well.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13172
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #141 on: June 09, 2012, 04:50:13 PM »
Didn't do too bad


Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #142 on: June 09, 2012, 04:53:02 PM »
Got more or did more than mini Maric for mine.

Keep him in next week.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #143 on: June 09, 2012, 04:53:25 PM »
Has very good potential in my opinion. Did ok when he came on.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #144 on: June 09, 2012, 05:29:39 PM »
Wasn't shy. More than happy to tackle, punch, and attack the footy. Good size too. Promising.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #145 on: June 09, 2012, 05:31:27 PM »
Let him play against his mate Shiel next week

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39025
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #146 on: June 09, 2012, 05:39:08 PM »
Was ok

Keep him in over Mini Maric who was shocking
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #147 on: June 09, 2012, 06:00:03 PM »
Was ok

Keep him in over Mini Maric who was shocking
disagree thought maric okay but a totally different type to ohanlon.

brett should be getting games as a medium forward who can mark.

if iyo he showed maric up he sure as hell would have showed vickery up and in the wet would have been a better option.

rance was shown up today. as was houli and jackson got a bit of ball but both  were  terrible.
nahas very ordinary. deledio got towelled but he had probably the inform tagger in the comp on him.
martin was ordinary. vickery lol nothing changes there and i know it was wet but the fumbles continued with batchelor.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #148 on: June 09, 2012, 06:18:48 PM »
Was ok

Keep him in over Mini Maric who was shocking
disagree thought maric okay but a totally different type to ohanlon.

brett should be getting games as a medium forward who can mark.

if iyo he showed maric up he sure as hell would have showed vickery up and in the wet would have been a better option.

rance was shown up today. as was houli and jackson got a bit of ball but both  were  terrible.
nahas very ordinary. deledio got towelled but he had probably the inform tagger in the comp on him.
martin was ordinary. vickery lol nothing changes there and i know it was wet but the fumbles continued with batchelor.
Agree with all that. Why didn't they have a short-behind as sub and start O'Hanlon on the flank at the beginning :huh He did well when he came on and there is no way he should be dropped next week - had 8 disposals in 20 mins of footy.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2012, 07:07:20 PM by Ruanaidh »

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Brett O'Hanlon [merged]
« Reply #149 on: June 12, 2012, 03:30:32 PM »
Well I thought Brett played quite well...... ;)
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.