Author Topic: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]  (Read 225823 times)

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1140 on: October 10, 2011, 09:02:30 PM »
Nothing is not entirely accurate, the compo picks have actually been quite generous and in comparrison to what most miserly clubs are qwilling to part with, theyd be better off waiting...as in No 15. 22 + Hampson...meh....will trump that with compo next year

Free agency means no compensation. Saints must be very confident he wants to stick around for the long haul.
Next year it could come down to what his after money or premiership. I cant see saints offering better opportunity on either of though two options compared to what other clubs can.

Pretty sure under free agency clubs will compensated in a similar way to clubs loosing uncontracted players to the new teams.

I just looked it back up and your right Al my mistake they do get compensation.
I wonder if he'll get ablett like compensation if he did walk out next year.

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1141 on: October 10, 2011, 09:03:28 PM »
Wonder if Bate will end up with us

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4842
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1142 on: October 10, 2011, 09:06:10 PM »
Wonder if Bate will end up with us

If we can get rid of some trash early (Morton, Nason, McGuane, Conners) I would be pretty very confident he will end up with us :whistle :whistle :whistle

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1143 on: October 10, 2011, 09:06:42 PM »
you do have a fixation with Master Bate, dont you jacko?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1144 on: October 10, 2011, 09:08:11 PM »
you do have a fixation with Master Bate, dont you jacko?

 :o

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1145 on: October 10, 2011, 09:09:47 PM »
he is at least better than 15 players on our list currently, so why not get him

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1146 on: October 10, 2011, 09:21:15 PM »
Master Bate's is useless, doesn't go hard, flops at the hard work, heard he has troubles performing in front of big crowds too . . . pass  :whistle

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1147 on: October 10, 2011, 09:26:17 PM »
Master Bate's is useless, doesn't go hard, flops at the hard work, heard he has troubles performing in front of big crowds too . . . pass  :whistle

You must not have seen any Richmond games this year.
Just jolt your memory, the supporters game against the Blues is enough.
Bate is better than Farmer, Connors, Morton, Webberley,Gourdis,White,Nason

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1148 on: October 10, 2011, 09:29:49 PM »
Master Bate's is useless, doesn't go hard, flops at the hard work, heard he has troubles performing in front of big crowds too . . . pass  :whistle

You must not have seen any Richmond games this year.
Just jolt your memory, the supporters game against the Blues is enough.
Bate is better than Farmer, Connors, Morton, Webberley,Gourdis,White,Nason

Get your hand off it Jackstar.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1149 on: October 10, 2011, 09:44:47 PM »
You one eyed supporters should go and watch other games during the year.you might learn something.Bate can play

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1150 on: October 10, 2011, 09:47:34 PM »
Nothing is not entirely accurate, the compo picks have actually been quite generous and in comparrison to what most miserly clubs are qwilling to part with, theyd be better off waiting...as in No 15. 22 + Hampson...meh....will trump that with compo next year

I dunno, they won't get the same compensation as Geelong for Ablett. A first round and 2nd round for Goddard.
Would think pick 15, 22 and Hampson is the same as Pick 10 and 18ish.

so less than scully you reckon ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5309
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1151 on: October 10, 2011, 09:59:13 PM »
Bate goes OK. Would be a similar player to Grigg IMO, but a forward version.

He's an upgrade on the stock we have currently and is in the age bracket of our A Graders.

If we can get him for nicks or for one of our dead weight players it's a positive.

Bate can play, would be an upgrade on Morton's spot.
Go Tigers!

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1152 on: October 10, 2011, 09:59:32 PM »
From a source from Carlton:

Blues are chasing our 1st round pick 15, have offered Kane Lucas, with the condition that the deal only gets done if Goddard is brought to Carlton.

So basically Carlton want us to agree with the deal so they can pitch a package to St.Kilda including the pick 15 as a sweetner.

Word is the package will be Hampson, Calrton 1st pick and Pick 15 for Goddard.

Lucas then comes to Richmond.

Lucas struggled this year.. He's probably worth Pick 15 though in a weak draft.

Deal doesn't get done on its own though, not a straight swap, only done in a three way deal.

Diabolical on our behalf first because we are helping Carlton and second because Lucas isnt worth pick 15 hes done nothing in AFL footy.

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1153 on: October 10, 2011, 10:01:13 PM »
Bate goes OK. Would be a similar player to Grigg IMO, but a forward version.

He's an upgrade on the stock we have currently and is in the age bracket of our A Graders.

If we can get him for nicks or for one of our dead weight players it's a positive.

Bate can play, would be an upgrade on Morton's spot.

Bate is better than Shaun Grigg IMHO although they are different players. We do need a lead up half forward who can take a mark, kick the odd and make an impact on the contest.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Trade week targets & rumours? [merged]
« Reply #1154 on: October 10, 2011, 10:02:45 PM »
Master Bate's is useless, doesn't go hard, flops at the hard work, heard he has troubles performing in front of big crowds too . . . pass  :whistle

You must not have seen any Richmond games this year.
Just jolt your memory, the supporters game against the Blues is enough.
Bate is better than Farmer, Connors, Morton, Webberley,Gourdis,White,Nason

pure gold  :lol
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI