71
Richmond Rant / Re: Coach Adem Yze [merged]
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 11:46:16 AM »Good decision.
His harsh critics have rocks in their heads IMO
His harsh critics have rocks in their heads IMO
News:
Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum 
Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Recent Posts
72
Richmond Rant / Re: Coach Adem Yze [merged]
« Last post by ajGreen on Yesterday at 11:32:01 AM »Well deserved.
Youd think the stability would have to be good for the younger guys on the list
73
Richmond Rant / Re: Coach Adem Yze [merged]
« Last post by Simonator on Yesterday at 11:16:48 AM »Well deserved.
74
Richmond Rant / Re: Coach Adem Yze [merged]
« Last post by ajGreen on Yesterday at 11:12:21 AM »Signed till end of 28'
75
Richmond Rant / Re: Rookie Draft
« Last post by ajGreen on Yesterday at 11:02:05 AM »Agree Andy. He is talking crap Rhy is.
Something must have peeed him off. Poor form to nominate then.
Why is it bad form? Has no affect on other clubs drafting him. That I can think off.
76
Richmond Rant / Re: Rookie Draft
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 10:12:15 AM »There's a limited range of scenarios IMO.
Is he good enough/ceiling high enough?
Yes/No
If no, don't draft.
If yes
Is he a nice enough kid or way too much of a DH?
Nice/DH
If DH, don't draft
If nice, draft
So either he's so damned ordinary that the club is convinced he isn't and never will be AFL standard, and every club agrees, yet he nominated for F/S regardless.
Or he's a massive DH and every club knows it, which I think is less likely, since most DH's tend to get chances at multiple AFL clubs anyway...
It's interesting, isn't it? The idea of nominating for F/S if the club has more or less told you that they won't take you...?
Absolutely agree, but when you can pick the kid up for nothing, on a short rookie contract...why not?
I don't need to look - personally I'd have used the rookie pick on Kellaway myself.
Is he good enough/ceiling high enough?
Yes/No
If no, don't draft.
If yes
Is he a nice enough kid or way too much of a DH?
Nice/DH
If DH, don't draft
If nice, draft
So either he's so damned ordinary that the club is convinced he isn't and never will be AFL standard, and every club agrees, yet he nominated for F/S regardless.
Or he's a massive DH and every club knows it, which I think is less likely, since most DH's tend to get chances at multiple AFL clubs anyway...
Agree Andy. He is talking crap Rhy is.
Something must have peeed him off. Poor form to nominate then.
It's interesting, isn't it? The idea of nominating for F/S if the club has more or less told you that they won't take you...?
Just because Duncan was good doesn’t mean his offspring will be, eg Roach and Naish
Happy for the club to make the call they think is correct
Absolutely agree, but when you can pick the kid up for nothing, on a short rookie contract...why not?
Have a look at Robert Thompson’s highlights and then at Kellaway's. I’d be curious if anyone thinks Robert Thompson looks better than Kellaway and if you think Robert Thompson will play 50 games in the seniors.
I don't need to look - personally I'd have used the rookie pick on Kellaway myself.
77
Richmond Rant / Re: Rookie Draft
« Last post by camboon on Yesterday at 09:06:33 AM »Have a look at Robert Thompson’s highlights and then at Kellaway's. I’d be curious if anyone thinks Robert Thompson looks better than Kellaway and if you think Robert Thompson will play 50 games in the seniors.
78
Richmond Rant / Re: Jayden Short [merged]
« Last post by camboon on Yesterday at 08:57:12 AM »- congratulations Shorty
79
Richmond Rant / Re: Rookie Draft
« Last post by MintOnLamb on Yesterday at 06:46:14 AM »Just because Duncan was good doesn’t mean his offspring will be, eg Roach and Naish
Happy for the club to make the call they think is correct
Happy for the club to make the call they think is correct
80
Richmond Rant / Re: Rookie Draft
« Last post by Francois Jackson on Yesterday at 06:41:26 AM »Agree Andy. He is talking crap Rhy is.
Something must have peeed him off. Poor form to nominate then.
Something must have peeed him off. Poor form to nominate then.
