91
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond AFLW team [merged]
« Last post by Chuck17 on November 26, 2025, 03:35:41 PM »Yep what an absolute farce
It needs to retitled as a Welcome to Soap Box
It needs to retitled as a Welcome to Soap Box
1. Nank
Hopefully a couple seasons left.
2. Sims.
3. Hayes-Brown
Getting better. 63 hit-outs one vfl game, others 40+
4. Ryan.
Obviously limited but as fine the 4th ruck for one more year.
Fawcett. Lefau break glass emergency options. I don't see the point of another stop gap ruck ahead of a kid with upside.
All that said they prob take Burton.
Nank established but ageing and gets quite beat up most years.
The idea that our #2 ruck is a teenager with 1 year under his belt and coming off surgery is concerning.
OHB untried at AFL level altogether.
Ryan with clear deficiencies and not looking promising at all.
Fawcett in the ruck?
Lefau also coming off another injury-riddled year.
I don't agree that we're set to go or that an 18yo undrafted kid is the answer for the medium term. We would definitely benefit from having a bloke aged 23-28 on the list with some proper ruck experience.
The bookmakers have Richmond finishing last.
What is the point of a 28 year old state league ruck currently?
The point is to remain competitive, try to win games, protect the kids (so Sims isn't #1 ruck if Nank goes down) and build a culture of success.
1. Nank
Hopefully a couple seasons left.
2. Sims.
3. Hayes-Brown
Getting better. 63 hit-outs one vfl game, others 40+
4. Ryan.
Obviously limited but as fine the 4th ruck for one more year.
Fawcett. Lefau break glass emergency options. I don't see the point of another stop gap ruck ahead of a kid with upside.
All that said they prob take Burton.
Nank established but ageing and gets quite beat up most years.
The idea that our #2 ruck is a teenager with 1 year under his belt and coming off surgery is concerning.
OHB untried at AFL level altogether.
Ryan with clear deficiencies and not looking promising at all.
Fawcett in the ruck?
Lefau also coming off another injury-riddled year.
I don't agree that we're set to go or that an 18yo undrafted kid is the answer for the medium term. We would definitely benefit from having a bloke aged 23-28 on the list with some proper ruck experience.
The bookmakers have Richmond finishing last.
What is the point of a 28 year old state league ruck currently?
I think we all agree with that sentiment Camboon, I don’t think you need to sign him for 3 more years to achieve that.
Like I have said, copy the model of the Dockers with Longmuir, far more progressive, achieving the same outcome.
He was signed for 2 more years not 3, still had 1 left on his original contract.
Exactly
2026 Final year of his contract and they've added a further 2 years
I have 2 points:-
1) We don’t really know a whole lot about Yze as coach. We cannot say he’s the answer yet and we cannot say he is not the answer - jury is out.
2) Noone can really articulate why based on point 1) on what basis he therefore qualifies to coach for another 3 years by being extended by 2 years
Therefore:-
Why extend him? Is there not a better mechanism than that?
All other points about the hand he has been dealt with are fine but no new coach (except Chris Scott) inherites a set and forget team.
Not sure about a half back whose main weaknesses are kicking efficient and decision making. Sounds like someone you wouldn’t want distributing the ball out of the back half.