Author Topic: Positives from last night's game?  (Read 4212 times)

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #30 on: April 05, 2010, 02:45:15 PM »
Infamy , your a D/head
You know what I mean.
On 3AW today it was interesting as they liken us to Fitzroy now.
With the draft being compromised from here on, we are in trouble.
Why we have recruited small players as recent as the last draft is beyond belief. ::)
Nason, good player, way too small,.
Have a rookie in Hicks who should be riding at the Valley today.
Its mistake after mistake at Punt Road,
Watched Craig Cameron at 3/4 time yesterday involved with postional changes on the whiteboard.
Who is running the place ?????? :banghead
Went and watched Coburg for a half on saturday, went home at half time in disgust.
The prediction in the Herald Sun was for Coburg to finish last, I can see why.
Might further add we are going anywhere until we field a stand alone reserves team, but some bright spark has made  decision to cement the alignment with Coburg :banghead

Probably because they know the reaction they will get out of Chicken Little's like you more than anything.
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #31 on: April 05, 2010, 03:07:42 PM »
Why we have recruited small players as recent as the last draft is beyond belief. ::)
Nason, good player, way too small,.
Have a rookie in Hicks who should be riding at the Valley today.
Its not like we only recruited smalls, we got a few kpps too
I'd prefer we take the player we think is most likely to make it as an AFL player than just picking a tall just for the sake of drafting more talls

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #32 on: April 05, 2010, 03:13:08 PM »
although you cant keep playing them all.
Saints play Milne and thats it.
We play several thus we end up with miss matches that kill us, as the opponents just brush as aside.
As was the case last night

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #33 on: April 05, 2010, 03:34:55 PM »
although you cant keep playing them all.
Saints play Milne and thats it.
We play several thus we end up with miss matches that kill us, as the opponents just brush as aside.
As was the case last night
Baker

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #34 on: April 05, 2010, 03:38:43 PM »
although you cant keep playing them all.
Saints play Milne and thats it.
We play several thus we end up with miss matches that kill us, as the opponents just brush as aside.
As was the case last night
Baker

Baker is tough, we aint

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40360
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #35 on: April 05, 2010, 03:51:09 PM »
Might further add we are going anywhere until we field a stand alone reserves team, but some bright spark has made  decision to cement the alignment with Coburg :banghead

What do you mean "cement" the alignment

I am intrigued  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2460
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #36 on: April 05, 2010, 05:18:33 PM »
Funny how the last 30 years and talk of small players are positives.

Cant wait to see the Negatives for last night game post.

Maybe a few of you dark clouds should buy a dictionary

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8466
  • In Absentia
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #37 on: April 05, 2010, 09:40:17 PM »
My positives:

We never let the Dogs get a run on, it was a 72 point thumping, but it was gradual. It wasn't a first half blitz, like Melbourne in round 1 or the Kangas in round 2 in which the game was over at half-time. We were only 31 down at half-time and had we kicked a little straighter in the 2nd term it could have been under 3 goals.

The defence worked pretty well I thought. The Dogs had 71 inside 50's. They were inaccurate, but I recall them not getting too many 'easy' shots on goals. A lot were long bombs or shots from the boundary.

Our pressure made the Dogs' skill look ordinary at times in the first half. Media reports say that they were uncharacteristic errors by the Dogs, but it was the zone and pressure from us. The media just won't acknowledge that.

The players were having a real crack and didn't drop their heads.

We will beat Melbourne!  :thumbsup
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #38 on: April 05, 2010, 10:30:23 PM »
Thursty and Mcguane were very good
Martin and Cotchin were very good
Tambling and Edwards played better and with more confidence
Connors played pretty well again
Vickery was solid
Morton was pretty good but outsized again
Newman and Deledio were good
Nason and Moore were solid
Reiwoldt and Post will improve
King and Nahas will be replaced by Cousins and Roberts

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #39 on: April 05, 2010, 10:58:40 PM »
the backline was fairly good  :rollin how anyone come up with that  :gobdrop

we got thumped by 70+ points thats not good  ;D sounds like some are satisfied

Offline Siberian

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #40 on: April 05, 2010, 11:06:59 PM »
With Bowden Brown Johnson Couglan and the lord Richo we might have lost by 55
We are where we are and it was the right choice, lets back the boys

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #41 on: April 05, 2010, 11:28:55 PM »
With Bowden Brown Johnson Couglan and the lord Richo we might have lost by 55
We are where we are and it was the right choice, lets back the boys

Good point Suffered....I feel the same way
Unleash the tornado

Offline Siberian

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #42 on: April 05, 2010, 11:54:51 PM »
Well the last thing any of us wanted at the end of 09 was more of the same, and we knew what it would cost

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #43 on: April 06, 2010, 08:20:17 AM »
the backline was fairly good  :rollin how anyone come up with that  :gobdrop

we got thumped by 70+ points thats not good  ;D sounds like some are satisfied

Maybe because the Dogs had 71 inside 50s thanks to consistent turnovers from us going forward and if the backline didn't play so well in stopping the constant barrage the margin would have been more like 120 points, not 70 points.
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Positives from last night's game?
« Reply #44 on: April 06, 2010, 08:56:24 AM »
the backline was fairly good  :rollin how anyone come up with that  :gobdrop

we got thumped by 70+ points thats not good  ;D sounds like some are satisfied

Maybe because the Dogs had 71 inside 50s thanks to consistent turnovers from us going forward and if the backline didn't play so well in stopping the constant barrage the margin would have been more like 120 points, not 70 points.

Yep.   :thumbsup