Author Topic: Nahas in Trouble  (Read 8948 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #60 on: May 14, 2012, 05:38:37 PM »
Here is the MRP's explanation...

Contact between Richmond's Robin Nahas and the Sydney Swans' Nick Smith from the third quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. Smith has his head down after picking up the ball when he is tackled by Nahas. Nahas applies a tackle, without making high contact, and takes Smith to ground with the forward momentum of the Sydney player. Smith's head makes contact with the ground but it was the view of the panel that Nahas did not use excessive force or drive his opponent into the ground. No further action was taken.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/135770/default.aspx

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #61 on: May 14, 2012, 06:04:22 PM »
Thought as much. Nothing in it.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Nahas in the Clear (Confirmed the Age)
« Reply #62 on: May 14, 2012, 06:11:46 PM »
From The Age:


The two other players scrutinised for tackles that caused their opponents to hit the head on the ground, Richmond's Robin Nahas and Essendon's Nathan Lovett-Murray, both escaped charges

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/crows-dream-run-ends-with-walker-suspended-20120514-1ymji.html#ixzz1upD1gZA7

Very lucky - will take it  :thumbsup

Lovett-Murray is the lucky one.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #63 on: May 14, 2012, 06:45:11 PM »
if it wasnt the dreamtime game they would have suspended lovett murray or if he was of a different culture. afl is fos, reverse racism at its best

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #64 on: May 14, 2012, 06:50:57 PM »
if it wasnt the dreamtime game they would have suspended lovett murray or if he was of a different culture. afl is fos, reverse racism at its best
Why wasn't Nahas suspended then?

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #65 on: May 14, 2012, 06:54:22 PM »
please explain reverse racism
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #66 on: May 14, 2012, 07:00:07 PM »
please explain reverse racism
Well there is no reverse racism in this case, if there is such a thing. Racism is racism, it does not matter where it comes from. If Nahas was suspended then perhaps one could argue a weak case.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #67 on: May 14, 2012, 07:05:40 PM »
thats what i was i getting at GR12. It's normally a silly term that by it's nature in the way it's used implies that only whites can be racist.

but giving favor to someone based on race could actually be reverse racism, as x man claims.

not that i think it's the case though.

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Nahas in Trouble
« Reply #68 on: May 14, 2012, 07:16:02 PM »
thats what i was i getting at GR12. It's normally a silly term that by it's nature in the way it's used implies that only whites can be racist.

but giving favor to someone based on race could actually be reverse racism, as x man claims.

not that i think it's the case though.
I knew where you coming from, Al and i agree.
However, i think the term username is looking for is 'affirmative action'.