New rule for head-high free kicks & ducking (afl site)

[one-eyed]

Under the changes, the following will apply:

- Any movement where a player drives or leads with their head into a stationary or near-stationary tackler will be deemed as a drive and will be umpired as the player with the ball having had ‘prior opportunity’;

- The player must immediately kick or handball or a free kick for holding the ball, under the prior opportunity rule, will be paid against him.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-06-01/afl-crackdown-on-headhigh-free-kicks

-----------------------------------------

AFL confirms new interpretation for head-high free kicks

Giulio Di Giorgio
afl.com.au
June 1, 2015 8:00 PM


THE AFL will enforce a stricter interpretation around players who lead with their heads to draw a free kick for high contact, which will take effect from this weekend.

Under the changes, a player who drives or leads his head into a stationary or near-stationary player will be classified as having had prior opportunity.

If the player is then tackled he will have to dispose of the ball properly to avoid being penalised for holding the ball under the prior opportunity rule.

Director of umpiring Wayne Campbell and umpires coach Hayden Kennedy have been briefing clubs on the changes.

The League's football operations manager Mark Evans said the stricter interpretation had been introduced to discourage players from leading with their heads to gain a free kick amid growing safety concerns.

"The onus is on the tackler to tackle the player with the ball legally. What we have begun to see in the game is the player with the ball driving his head toward a tackler or leaning into a tackler in order to receive a free kick," Evans said.

"The AFL has significant concerns around player safety with this tactic and the interpretation change was considered an important enough issue by the Laws of the Game Committee to deal with in-season."

Campbell said the League had decided to introduce the new interpretation to "shift the onus back" towards the player in possession of the ball.

"There was a rule introduced about driving the head and prior opportunity 18 months ago (but) it's fair to say it was a loose interpretation," Campbell told Fox Footy on Monday night.

"It's [the old interpretation] where a player has his head over the ball, picks the ball up and in order for it to be a drive under the way we interpreted it, he needed to take two or three steps forward towards the tackler.

"We think the onus has been put all on to the tackler to protect the player's head … but we just think that maybe players with the ball are taking advantage of that."

Evans said there would be no change to stop awarding free kicks if a player shrugs or drops his knees into a tackle and the action causes high contact to occur.

There had been a strong focus on players ducking for free kicks in recent weeks, with the players including North Melbourne forward Lindsay Thomas and Geelong midfielder Joel Selwood accused of initiating head-high contact to earn free kicks.

Thomas was awarded three contentious free kicks for high contact in the Kangaroos' 11-point over Essendon in round seven.

Richmond chief executive Brendon Gale took to social media to express his concerns for players' safety during the Roos-Bombers clash.

"Players leading with their heads, fishing for free kicks, is much more than a blight on the game. It's terrifying," Gale wrote on Twitter, later clarifying that his comment was not directed towards Thomas.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-06-01/duck-season-is-over

[DCrane]

Mid season interpretation changes don't usually turn out that well. The umps always overdo it early then they will ease off but they wont do a tour of the clubs to tell them that will they. 
Interesting that they are trying to coin a new phrase for the tactic-a 'drive'
Umpires, you have to hand it to them, always trying to find ways to validate their existence in the game. How clever of them to hire ex Richmond people to lead the way in this area.

[(•))(©™]

 

[Penelope]

Mid season interpretation changes don't usually turn out that well. The umps always overdo it early then they will ease off but they wont do a tour of the clubs to tell them that will they. 
Interesting that they are trying to coin a new phrase for the tactic-a 'drive'
Umpires, you have to hand it to them, always trying to find ways to validate their existence in the game. How clever of them to hire ex Richmond people to lead the way in this area.

In fairness, this isnt the umpires pushing the change.

I know that umpires themselves, like the rest of us, get frustrated with the constant tinkering with the rules.

One umpire i know up here, once told me that when he started umpiring, all those years ago, that they could carry the rule book in their shirt pocket.

now they would need a small backback to carry the rulebook with them