Author Topic: Jack Lonie  (Read 7595 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Jack Lonie
« Reply #30 on: July 09, 2015, 02:03:19 PM »
given Hardwicks angst about being able to trade players without their consent, i suspect we have had trades fall through because players did not consent.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Jack Lonie
« Reply #31 on: July 09, 2015, 02:26:11 PM »
Most people were complaining that we didn't land a big fish last year but my main complaint was that we didn't at least trade back into the draft - which was all the more perplexing when you consider we rated the draft very highly and had apparently been planning for it and targeting it since even before the previous year's draft.

and they knew this draft was going to b weak
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18550
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Jack Lonie
« Reply #32 on: July 09, 2015, 02:28:45 PM »
given Hardwicks angst about being able to trade players without their consent, i suspect we have had trades fall through because players did not consent.

Maybe so al, but surely just trading for at least one extra pick inside the top 40 shouldn't be that big of an ask.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.