Author Topic: Tigers attempt to tame board challengers with constitution change (Age)  (Read 1252 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98225
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Tigers attempt to tame board challengers with constitution change

Rohan Connolly
The Age
24 November 2016


Richmond will attempt to make it harder for agitators to launch potential boardroom coups in a motion to be presented to their annual general meeting on December 14.

The Tigers, who have recently dealt with at least two potential board upheavals, are trying to change the club constitution, which currently requires the lodgement of only 100 signatures from the membership base to force an extraordinary general meeting.

The club wants to remove the 100-signature clause from their articles, making the minimum requirement five per cent of members eligible to vote, which would bring the club's constitution into line with the Corporations Act.

From a total membership of 72,000, the Tigers have approximately 50,000 eligible voters, which means an extraordinary general meeting petition would require at least 2500 signatures.

The move is one of a number of constitutional amendments Richmond is attempting to pass, including a limit on the tenure of club directors to only three terms.

Richmond president Peggy O'Neal told Fairfax Media on Wednesday that ultimately it would still be up to the membership base to determine whether such changes were acceptable. "The amendments to the constitution that we are putting to members to approve were recommended to the board by the club's governance committee after due consideration and legal advice," O'Neal said.

"The amendments cover a variety of topics and some changes are intended to bring us into line with current corporations law and others reflect best practice governance standards. Ultimately, our members will decide, but the board thinks that these are sensible changes."

Recent potential board challenges from "Focus on Football" and another group known as the "Malvern Hotel" group have been placated by the club, partly due to the proposal to limit directors' tenure, and by the recent appointment of former Tiger player Neil Balme to the role of football manager.

Richmond members are due to vote on two directorships in the lead-up to the AGM.

Incumbents Emmett Dunne and Kerry Ryan are both standing for re-election, but they are being challenged by two more candidates in Simon Wallace and Peter Casey.

Another director, former player Tony Free, who had one year left of his term, recently announced he was stepping down, though the vacancy left by his departure will be filled by a board nomination.

O'Neal has rebutted the popular allegation that the Richmond board has become stale, arguing that with Dunne and John O'Rourke having joined the committee in the past 12 months as well as chief executive Brendon Gale in a role as executive director, three of 10 directors have been in their roles for a year or less.

http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/richmond-attempt-to-tame-tiger-board-challengers-with-constitution-change-20161123-gsw1wi

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4495
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Tigers attempt to tame board challengers with constitution change (Age)
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2016, 08:37:45 PM »
Of course

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tigers attempt to tame board challengers with constitution change (Age)
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2016, 09:02:22 PM »
Maintaining their incumbency seems to be this board's top priority with winning flags way down the list....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2480
Re: Tigers attempt to tame board challengers with constitution change (Age)
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2016, 09:17:30 PM »
As I said in another thread this board is corrupt and self serving.

Offline casper68

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tigers attempt to tame board challengers with constitution change (Age)
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2016, 09:51:36 PM »
If you do not get elected to the board like our President, does that mean that she has not served a term yet?

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tigers attempt to tame board challengers with constitution change (Age)
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2016, 10:49:17 PM »
Biggest load of bull poo i have ever read.

How many times has an EGM  been instigated. Last time i looked just once and at the time we were being labelled fitzroy like and 5 mil in debt.THANK GOD FOR THAT EGM I SAY.
Just another way of watering down the members rights

This process is not being abused it has shown its value so why change it.FOF and the Malvern group have had a lever to get the board to act on things that are rotten and at least some change has occured.

Sneaky pricks are trying to muddy the waters putting this in with three yr terms. If people are stupid enough to fall for this crap then they deserve what they get .