Author Topic: Dusty and Rance named All-Australians [update]  (Read 3978 times)

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4329
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Dusty and Rance named All-Australians [update]
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2017, 10:33:49 PM »
Mitchell is the lowest impact player I have seen that racks up those numbers

Well maybe apart from Priddis

Scott West

Online one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97303
    • One-Eyed Richmond


Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: All-Australian Tigers this year?
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2017, 04:44:58 AM »
Hardwick was shocked Tigers captain Trent Cotchin failed to make the All-Australian squad of 40: “I obviously watch him a lot closer than most, and I still maintain the measure of a player is what you do to the players around you, and he’s made our players better. The measure of him as a captain has been phenomenal at our footy club this year.”

Cotchin joked he was “busy” last night anyway, but said the prize of playing in the finals — with the double chance — was something he wanted more than another individual honour.

Source: Herald-Sun website

Maybe Mrs Cotchin should make a statement too
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
  • In Absentia
Re: Dusty and Rance named All-Australians [update]
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2017, 09:20:11 AM »
Has McGovern been any better than Astbury?

Vlaustin would have been a shoo-in with a full season.

Selwood in on name.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Online lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2850
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Dusty and Rance named All-Australians [update]
« Reply #20 on: August 31, 2017, 09:32:08 AM »
I thought Josh Kennedy was a bit unlucky. The 0-6 start would not have helped him. I would have gone Jacobs over Ryder.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Dusty and Rance named All-Australians [update]
« Reply #21 on: August 31, 2017, 10:21:00 AM »
Including Selwood is a stretch. Gun player but missed a chunk of the year and really hasn't played at his best for the rest.

Can argue midfielders like Cotchin missing out all day but still think Grimes was real stiff not making the squad at least. One of, of not the most versatile defender in the league. Plays tall, small, rarely beaten and added an attacking quality to his game this season.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7927
Re: Dusty and Rance named All-Australians [update]
« Reply #22 on: August 31, 2017, 10:38:01 AM »
Has McGovern been any better than Astbury?

Vlaustin would have been a shoo-in with a full season.

Selwood in on name.

McGovern is a much better player than Astbury. Agree Vlas and Selwood
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
  • In Absentia
Re: Dusty and Rance named All-Australians [update]
« Reply #23 on: August 31, 2017, 01:43:35 PM »
Has McGovern been any better than Astbury?

Vlaustin would have been a shoo-in with a full season.

Selwood in on name.

McGovern is a much better player than Astbury. Agree Vlas and Selwood

But has McGovern been better this year?
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do