We have 16 players with over 100 games. All of them bar one Castagna, are in best 23 and would be considered for best 23.
We have 5 players with 50 - 99 games. Pickett 31yo, Baker 25yo, Bolton 24yo, Balta 23yo all best 23 and Graham 25yo who is being spoken as borderline but would come under consideration.
We have just 2 players with 20 to 49 games. Soldo 26yo and Ross 22yo. Both are borderline and injury cover at this point. Don't think either would be considered best 23 atm.
We have 6 players with 10 to 19 games. Ralphsmith 21yo, Gibcus 19yo, M Rioli 20yo, Miller 23yo, Mansell 22yo, Dow 21yo. Only Rioli has cemented a spot but Miller Gibcus and Ralphsmith are definately on the cusp if not in the team..
We have 14 players with 9 to 0 games. In fact only three have played more than one game. Only 2 have established themselves best 23 Cumberland 22yo and Sonsie 20yo. Clarke is probably next as cover for a sml/fwd injury. and would be considered atm
By that reckoning i count 28 players who can be considered best 23. The question to ask is which 5 miss out in the interest of structure and team balance with at least a small eye on long term and avoiding a huge chasm between the 20 odd with 50 plus games behind them and the 20 odd with few games.