The way we played in the second half umpiring would not have made a difference in the games result. Perhaps only a points margin so those who threw money on Adelaide by over 39.5 would be happy as compared to those who took the Crows under 39.5. Realistically a 50 point result would have been 26 or 32 points and if you throw in turnovers that resulted directly in goals what would the margin have been?? Simply nowhere near good enough. Umpiring decisions were baffling but not game changing and game defining.
