Author Topic: Rushed behind rule farce  (Read 1646 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58605
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Rushed behind rule farce
« on: February 27, 2009, 06:02:23 AM »
What a surprise it was Richmond first pinged for this stupid new rule and the call by the ump was wrong  ::). Imagine if a GF was decided like that  :help :scream.


And while we're talking about NAB Cup rules, don't you get a nine-point supergoal for a F.A.D.? Jack was pushed in the back after kicking it from just outside 50 and the free was paid down the field yet it was ruled just a normal six-pointer.

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

richmondrules

  • Guest
Re: Rushed behind rule farce
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2009, 07:33:15 AM »
And while we're talking about NAB Cup rules, don't you get a nine-point supergoal for a F.A.D.? Jack was pushed in the back after kicking it from just outside 50 and the free was paid down the field yet it was ruled just a normal six-pointer.

That was certainly the rule when we played against Freo.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Rushed behind rule farce
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2009, 11:12:54 AM »
Chuck in the not 20 play on poop also, Ratten is right on that one.
Richo centered one beautifully to the middle right in front of goals and as the player (?) knew it was going to be called passed it out to the bounday and out of bounds ! An almost certain goal from a passage of play called FOOTBALL goes begging. Stupid fn rules and stupid fn AFL.

On that note I pray for the day when a coach has the balls to take on the game with players staying in relative postiton instead of flooding backwards and forwards ! it is fn terrible to watch  :banghead

I spose you can not see it as clearly on telly, but at the game it is AWFUL  :banghead and a little bit more  :banghead

Offline JBFTiger

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
  • A Fighting Fury
Re: Rushed behind rule farce
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2009, 11:29:06 AM »
I noticed another rule change last night, that has gone largely unannounced by the AFL!

Apparently now it is ok for a player to:
 - fly for a mark 5 minutes before the ball arrives
 - place both legs around an opponents neck
 - miss the ball
 - and land square in their back (Leon Davis on Daniel Jackson 1st Quarter)

NO FREE KICK!

WTF
 

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58605
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Rushed behind rule farce
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2009, 05:41:25 PM »
They usually give the player going for the speckie the benefit of the doubt provided the ump believes it was a realistic attempt at the mark.

And while we're talking about NAB Cup rules, don't you get a nine-point supergoal for a F.A.D.? Jack was pushed in the back after kicking it from just outside 50 and the free was paid down the field yet it was ruled just a normal six-pointer.

That was certainly the rule when we played against Freo.
The umps consistently inconsistent  :P
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline 3rogerd

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Rushed behind rule farce
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2009, 06:38:53 PM »
who is the clown who continually plays around with the rules?

its about time someone punched the crap out of him.

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rushed behind rule farce
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2009, 07:37:15 PM »
who is the clown who continually plays around with the rules?

its about time someone punched the crap out of him.
:thatsgold

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98414
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Umpire's call against was Jordan McMahon wrong (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2009, 02:26:40 AM »
Umpire's call against was Jordan McMahon wrong
Jon Ralph | February 28, 2009

THE AFL umpiring department has admitted an umpire erred in penalising Richmond's Jordan McMahon for a deliberately rushed behind against Collingwood.

McMahon made history late in the final quarter when he became the first player to be penalised under the new trial rule.

He was hemmed in on the boundary and while trying to handball he was tackled by John Anthony and the ball jarred loose over the behind line.

The infringement was paid by field umpire Simon Meredith.

The AFL's instructional DVD, Laws of Australian Football 2009, outlines the criteria an umpire must use to determine whether a behind has been deliberately rushed.

They are:

WHAT is the player's intention?

IS THE player contesting the ball?

WHAT is the degree of pressure the player is under?

WAS there a teammate in the vicinity of where the ball crossed the scoring line?

Related LinksRuling fallout: Bump rule tweak
In McMahon's case, all four of those issues were relevant.

McMahon tried to handball to teammate Matt White, who was in the goalsquare, while under extreme pressure.

The AFL yesterday said after consideration, the decision was simply wrong.

"The view was that after a full analysis, it wasn't a correct decision," AFL spokesman Patrick Keane said.

"He had his arm clipped as he was going to handball and it changed the handball's direction. Our initial view was that he had handballed it straight across the line, but he had a teammate in his vicinity and his intention was to go to that teammate. He was bumped and tackled as he was trying to dispose of it."

While no harm was done in what was a comprehensive loss for Richmond, it shows the rule will become a matter of interpretation, and particularly crucial in close games.

Richmond was unfussed yesterday, with football manager Ross Monaghan saying no complaint would be lodged.

"We will leave it up to the AFL as to whether they thought it was a correct decision or not. We are not too concerned about it. I am sure the umpires will have a look at it," he said.

Post-match, coach Terry Wallace said he was likely to contact AFL umpires' boss Jeff Gieschen to get a proper ruling.

"We're not allowed to talk about umpires' decisions, unfortunately, but I'll speak to Jeff about it, just to get clarification with it," he said.

"I was surprised with the call, but that's OK, everyone's got to get used to what goes on. It didn't make any difference to the game, so we don't get carried away by any of those sorts of things."

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25116780-19742,00.html

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Rushed behind rule farce
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2009, 11:41:01 AM »
Only way to fix the AFL is for the public to boycott games
New rules will continue to destroy the game.
Teltra Dome l refuse to go there just cause

#1 its a poo venue & was built wrong
#2 prices go up every year, & even up them in a recession is pure greed is not a family venue
#3 they give some clubs advantage with the roof open
#4 its not a place to play our home games we belong at the MCG
#5 l purely just hate the place it should be a rugby stadium for Melbourne Storm