Author Topic: Triers and Dead Weight  (Read 1040 times)

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5860
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Triers and Dead Weight
« on: March 27, 2009, 11:33:03 AM »
First off want to make mention that despite the loss looking at the very few positives.

Players that tried hard and gave 100%:

Foley
Morton
Richo
Tambling
McGuane

For mine the dead wieght that were running out on the G last night were:

Bowden
McMahon
Edwards (even though i like him)

just can't play next week at Geelong.. with Raines and Cousins injury they will scrap in to avoid crises talks.



Outs:
Cousins
Raines

Ins:
Polo
Rance/Collins
Go Tigers!

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14255
Re: Triers and Dead Weight
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2009, 11:43:37 AM »
Bowden, Brown and Johnson, Schulz and Pettifer have all got to go. Mcmahon is too poo to call a dead weight. fuqckin joke that prick is
The most demoralising stat i read today was the blues had about 7 players playing under 25 games, we had 1.

If that doesn't tell you we are doomed then i dont know what does.


Triers

Foley
Richo
Morton
Jack(most of the time)
Moore

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5860
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Triers and Dead Weight
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2009, 11:50:14 AM »
Forgot Schultz.. baffled that he was tried as a forward again. How many years have we tried this and found that his work rate isnt high enough?

CLEVE HUGHES is such a better option than Schultz. Even Patto would be better for mine. We had absolutly no structure at all.

RIEWOLDT did try, shame he missed some getable shots.

Last years:
Bowden, Schultz, Pettifer,

Iffies:
Brown, McMahon, Johnson



It was the worst game I've evr seen I just don't know where to start with how to fix this?
Go Tigers!

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13332
Re: Triers and Dead Weight
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2009, 12:58:49 PM »
Forgot Schultz.. baffled that he was tried as a forward again. How many years have we tried this and found that his work rate isnt high enough?

CLEVE HUGHES is such a better option than Schultz.

Maybe not but if you think Hughes is any better you are delusional

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5860
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Triers and Dead Weight
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2009, 02:23:09 PM »
Atleast we would have an option going forward that can take a mark..

we get Morton on his own and Bowden backs back into him and both spill it...

sighs.
Go Tigers!