Author Topic: Deledio,Tuck, Foley  (Read 1118 times)

Offline tigerlily

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 33
Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« on: May 03, 2009, 02:36:24 PM »
In a carbon copy of the Melbourne game these 3 players, 2 in the leadership group have had zero influence on this game, whle White Jackson and Tambling are working hard they're getting no support from these 3 passengers, no discipline, no leadership. Seems to be a culture of I'll get a game every week. Wallace won't drop them, he cant afford to while hanging to his job by a thread, this has been a problem for two long, this club needs a massive shake -up, when your leaders are so soft and so uninspiring what hope for our young players

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59483
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2009, 03:10:31 PM »
They must have all got a rocket at half-time. Intensity finally up to the level required in that 3rd quarter. Should be closer but we still can pinch this if we can keep that intensity and pressure up for one more quarter  :pray.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2009, 03:53:23 PM »
Foley hasnt been sighted all season- the way he is going youd almost put him up for trade at years end.

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2009, 03:58:35 PM »
bit rough on tuck, put his body on the line at every contest, he was important to us and woul drather him than the others cos he busts his poop shute in every game

Offline Wildride

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2009, 05:05:03 PM »
Ramps - Foley played on McVeigh, had 22 possies to 19 so probably a draw with one of their more dangerous mids. Would've thought that was a fair game from Foley.

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2009, 05:17:09 PM »
Ramps - Foley played on McVeigh, had 22 possies to 19 so probably a draw with one of their more dangerous mids. Would've thought that was a fair game from Foley.

wake up
stats mean nothing, its what you do with the ball that counts

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2009, 05:18:38 PM »
Ramps - Foley played on McVeigh, had 22 possies to 19 so probably a draw with one of their more dangerous mids. Would've thought that was a fair game from Foley.
McVeigh had more of an impact with his posessions. His kicks were to the advantage of his teammates. Unfortunantely for us Axel had a number of turnovers today and my patience as the patience of other Tiger fans is wearing thin with regards to this because of this.
I wouldn't call it under the above summation a break even.

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2009, 05:21:36 PM »
foley lost , was not even

Offline tigerlily

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 33
Re: Deledio,Tuck, Foley
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2009, 05:22:13 PM »
Proberbly all a bit better in the 2nd half just like the Melbourne game, most possessions not damaging, not creating goals and not for 4 quaters, White's possies create more scoring opportunities then the 3 put together and he does it all day from running hard and making space not from having a high profile name