Team this week

[tiger till i die]

Daniel Jackson is a complete dud and players like him are exactly why  we are terrible.
HE CANT KICK THE FOOTY PROPERLY AND HE HAS POOR DECISION MAKING SKILLS.
Whoever cant see that is delusional.

I Agree fully, You know why??? BECUASE were are the tigers and we deserve to be up with Collingwood, Carlton, Saints ect we cant just say Oh well at least he is just a brick wall  e.g cant kick , run, pass or even THINK!!

we need better and deserve it too

[TigerTime]

Daniel Jackson is a complete dud and players like him are exactly why  we are terrible.
HE CANT KICK THE FOOTY PROPERLY AND HE HAS POOR DECISION MAKING SKILLS.
Whoever cant see that is delusional.

He is a better kick than Tuck and he is just as tough. Jackson should replace Tuck as the hardnut in the midfield, when Cotchin comes back in. Maybe we can find a spot for Tucky in the forward line.

i agree , on all counts.
tuck would be good in oyr fwd line too. add some fwd defensive pressure, he is a good mark, and even though his kicking in general play is poor, his goal kicking is quite good
good thought DC

[Judge Roughneck]

Daniel Jackson is a complete dud and players like him are exactly why  we are terrible.
HE CANT KICK THE FOOTY PROPERLY AND HE HAS POOR DECISION MAKING SKILLS.
Whoever cant see that is delusional.

He is a better kick than Tuck and he is just as tough. Jackson should replace Tuck as the hardnut in the midfield, when Cotchin comes back in. Maybe we can find a spot for Tucky in the forward line.

i agree , on all counts.
tuck would be good in oyr fwd line too. add some fwd defensive pressure, he is a good mark, and even though his kicking in general play is poor, his goal kicking is quite good
good thought DC

Tuck is also quite tall. He might be like Martin Pike adding abit of grunt up forward.

That said Tuck is better than Jackon.

[TigerTime]

tuck may have the tickets on jacksn atm, but imo jackson has more upside and improvement in him, tuck hasnt. i would like to see him, tuck that is up fwd, as u said he is deceptively tall and good overhead

[gtig]

gtig's fwd bonanza for this week's  Brisbane slaughter:

B:    Rance      Bowden       Newman
HB:  Jackson       McGuane       McMahon
C:   Deledio       Cousins        Tambling
HF:  Collins      Brown        Riewoldt
F:   Gourdis       Schulz          Nahas
R:   Simmo      Coughlan           Foley

Int:Tuck,Graham,JON,Morton
Emg: Cotchin, Moore, Polo

i know a lot of you blokes bag mcmahon and jackson, but i think they both add heaps. it was hard to leave out white. If Silvester was elevated I'd switch him with Bowden, at least for this week.

[MattR]

B   McGuane   Moore   Bowden      
HB   Rance   Newman   Delideo      
C   Cotchin   Coughlan   Cousins      
HF   Brown   Riewoldt   Tambling      
F   Edwards   Vickery   Nahas      
Foll   Simmonds   Graham   Foley      
Int   Jackson   Tuck   Collins   White   
emerg   Morton   White   Polo      
in   Cousins, Cotchin, Vickery, Simmonds, Brown, Edwards            
out   Morton, Richo, JON, McMahon, Pattison, Polo,            

Winning is still important and so is blending the right experience with youth.  Pattison, Morton and Polo are the unlucky ones for me but just don't quite have the class, output or physical attrtibutes.  JON is not going to make it as an ALF footballer and McMahon has too many down sides for his few upsides.  Vickery is a project player who needs games as is Riewoldt (playing the hardest position in footy).  Brown is in to give the forward line a leader (same for Bowden down back).  Midfield is now a nice combination of inside (Coughlan, Tuck, Cotchin, Foley) and outside players (Delideo, Tambling, Cousins, Collins, White and Edwards) more potent and pacy.

[Chuck17]

Vickery is a project player who needs games as is Riewoldt

You would hope they are not project players as they cost us first rounders, project players should be rookied.

[MattR]

Fair call.  All the same, we won't know what they might have or get games into them by playing for Coburg.  Let's have a good look and see.