"I wouldn't go anywhere near Richmond": Walls

[one-eyed]

Walls just said he wouldn't go anywhere near Richmond as he's had a very hard look at the list and it is very ordinary. North's list is much better.

[yellowandback]

Okay Wallsy, now back that up.
Oh, that's right - you simply cannot.

[Jackstar is back]

I think that Robert is 100% correct

[Jackstar is back]

Okay Wallsy, now back that up.
Oh, that's right - you simply cannot.

You obvisously havent seen Pettifer, McMahon, JON, Hughes, Schulz etc etc etc play have you

[Go Richo 12]

I think that Robert is 100% correct

Well strike me down! Who would have thought Jack would agree with a comment like that

[WA Tiger]

Well considering Walls is part of the reason our list is "not as good as North" he can't really comment can he!!!! Bowden, Tivendale and a heap of others were there when he was there and he didn't get rid of them then...... shut your mouth Walls and go back into your corner..... Carlton corner!!

[Hellenic Tiger]

Strike me down. Walls is

a) Bitter he got sacked.
b) Will make a comment based on where the wind is blowing
c) Will just make that comment and won't state a fact
d) Is prone to make an about face very quickly when a situation changes.
e) Has been on the Carlton gravy train since Judd arrived.
f) Yet last year thought the improvement on the side was natural based on sound recruiting and playing a handful of kids in the horror that was 2007.

Enough said about Walls. Just ignore what he has to say and move on life.
Regardless of the tank fest that might be in store come this Sunday round 5 when we beat them by 36 points. Of course being Robert Walls means when it comes to Richmond means you have selected memory such as lucidly remembering the 1972 GF but clearly repressing the GF of 69 and  Bash a Carlscum 73.

[tigertough12]

Okay Wallsy, now back that up.
Oh, that's right - you simply cannot.

You obvisously havent seen Pettifer, McMahon, JON, Hughes, Schulz etc etc etc play have you

last time i checked none of those mentioned are playing in the SENIORS 

[bojangles17]

Okay Wallsy, now back that up.
Oh, that's right - you simply cannot.

You obvisously havent seen Pettifer, McMahon, JON, Hughes, Schulz etc etc etc play have you

want me to start on North mebourne ...hows daniel haris, corey jones & arron edwards going..i couldnt be bothered looking up the rest but it aint pretty, there probably 2-3 years behind us

[Jackstar is back]

Harris and Jones would eat the players I mentioned.

[mat073]

Oh Robbie

You are going to look very foolish next weekend if the tigers win.

Last weekend the Richmond team had a combined total of 1235 games....North had a combined total of 2079 games.

While Im not necessary hoping for a win next week....It would be pretty funny if we won while conceding 800 games experience.

[smasha]

MEDIA ARE A BUNCH OF POOFTA RICHMOND HATING NUFFIES.

[torch]

this striked me too.

i can see the problem at Richmond, however 'our' list is a lot better then North Melbourne's.

if the AFL only had a Under 23's competition, Richmond would do very well.

we have 'bad players', but i think our younger players/better players are better then North Melbourne.

when Havery and Simpson retire, North Melbourne are going to find it hard to find leaders.

Jack Ziebell they love and say he will be a future captain this and that, well, we have Trent Cotchin.

however, just have to see against North Melbourne on sunday.

but, do we tank?