Can anyone explain to me the sanctity of the AFL umpires?
I can understand the players not being able to criticize them, the umpires are there to do the job of controlling the game and should be held in a higher regard than the players. What I cant understand is the coaches or club board members (CEO or President etc) being able to voice concerns .
Some games are an absolute farce yet the umpires remain protected.
I really can’t fathom the media being to scared to say anything, occasionally they will make a quick comment on an umpiring decision and move on just as quick. On the Sunday Footy show today Billy Brownless was making comments about a boundary umpire getting involved in a goal decision, James Brayshaw couldn’t move him on quick enough.
These people are not volunteers and are paid for the job they do. Therefore they should be open to all scrutiny from the media and public as the players and clubs are. Anyone employed to do a job is under some kind of review. If you are in the private sector it is usually for your direct supervisor. Anyone in the public sector ranging from our prime minister to the checkout chick at your local supermarket or even the Telstra guy coming to connect your phone is open to public expectations and review. This includes the media.
This leads me back to my initial question. Why are the AFL umpires a protected species?