Author Topic: Connors Vs Tambling  (Read 5593 times)

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13308
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #45 on: August 22, 2010, 07:36:52 AM »
What did everyone think of Connors today.

Can't understand the change in him over the last six or so games.

Personally dragged down our kicking efficiency when everyone else was hitting targets.  The number of long bombs into the forward line after waiting for the Saints defense to flood was really impressive.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40360
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #46 on: August 22, 2010, 09:45:32 AM »
What did everyone think of Connors today.

Can't understand the change in him over the last six or so games.

Personally dragged down our kicking efficiency when everyone else was hitting targets.  The number of long bombs into the forward line after waiting for the Saints defense to flood was really impressive.

Dan was the same old Dan = SELFISH (just look at that "effort" on the wing  :banghead)

But hey the coach loves him
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3812
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #47 on: August 22, 2010, 09:56:39 AM »
His kicking was very poor. He was lazy. He just kicked without thinking. Kicks never went to our advantage. Was very unimpressed. Should be dropped.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #48 on: August 22, 2010, 12:03:02 PM »
His kicking was very poor. He was lazy. He just kicked without thinking. Kicks never went to our advantage. Was very unimpressed. Should be dropped.

Agree.  His kicking was disgraceful yesterday.

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #49 on: August 22, 2010, 12:07:48 PM »
yesterday leigh matthews gave Dan a descent rap...thought he had a future.....just cant see what he sees,but hey he's leigh mathews and i'm not

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40360
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #50 on: August 22, 2010, 04:36:10 PM »
His kicking was very poor. He was lazy. He just kicked without thinking. Kicks never went to our advantage. Was very unimpressed. Should be dropped.

Agree.  His kicking was disgraceful yesterday.

I would argue (strongly) that it's been like that all year but can get hidden away when things are going well (read you're winning) compared to when things aren't going well.

As I said before and I will say it again he is a very selfish player
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #51 on: August 22, 2010, 05:40:38 PM »
His kicking was very poor. He was lazy. He just kicked without thinking. Kicks never went to our advantage. Was very unimpressed. Should be dropped.

He is a pretty good kick but you have nailed the problem - "He doesn't think". Just slings his legs across his body and hopes. Also dislike his addiction to the '70s dummy sell. Players just run straight at him and his farkt.

He does has talent but needs to get fit.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Online Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2450
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #52 on: August 22, 2010, 05:51:50 PM »
I think Connors goes on the list of "need another year" to make a call. Becasue we have such a high number of new players this year (14 from memory) that list is getting very long and thats why we wont be to good next year either. The year after will be the big turnover of players if they dont come up to scratch.

Both Dan and Richard have another year.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!