Author Topic: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis  (Read 1608 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Deledio in sprint challenge
Daniel Lane
August 15, 2010

 
RICHMOND'S Brett Deledio will race rugby league speedsters Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis in the 100 metres to determine Australia's fastest footballer.

Deledio was handpicked by AFL fitness guru John Quinn for the race, which will take place at the Sydney Olympic Park Athletic Centre on September 15.

Quinn will soon renew his association with coach Kevin Sheedy after agreeing to join Greater Western Sydney as the team's high-performance manager.

The world's fastest man, Usain Bolt of Jamaica, will oversee the sprint, which has been named in his honour.

''John Quinn was quite emphatic that Brett Deledio will really take it to the NRL stars,'' said meeting director Hayden Knowles of Competitive Edge.

''It is shaping as a big event. We'll be announcing the other runners soon and we're looking at millions of dollars' worth of football talent on the track. This will be a great test for all the competitors.''

Hayne, of the Parramatta Eels, was a national schoolboy athletics champion - he won the 100 metres hurdles in 13.1 seconds - while Melbourne Storm star Inglis professes a love for running and is described by Knowles as a natural.

Deledio, 23, was Richmond's No. 1 draft pick in 2004 and the club's best and fairest in 2008 and 2009.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/deledio-in-sprint-challenge-20100814-12468.html

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2010, 11:51:04 AM »
why not hicks

he runs 100 in 10.7 sec

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2010, 05:30:30 PM »
why not hicks

he runs 100 in 10.7 sec
i totally agree ... but lids more well known by the AFL world

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2010, 09:28:18 PM »
For some reason Courtney Dempsey had replaced Lids in this sprint challenge tonight before the AFL banned him anyway from contesting it because the sprint was sponsored by Gatorade while the AFL is sponsored by Powerade. The Daily Telegraph is calling the AFL wowsers but the event was a farce anyway as a "battle of the codes" as it was all NRL players plus one token soccer player.



ESSENDON star Courtenay Dempsey has been banned from contesting the Gatorade Bolt - with the AFL threatening to fine him $20,000 if he takes the track.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/afl-wowsers-order-courtenay-dempsey-not-to-compete-in-gatorade-usain-bolt-sprint/story-e6frexni-1225923809482
 


Ox

  • Guest
Re: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2010, 09:54:17 PM »



ESSENDON star Courtenay Dempsey has been banned from contesting the Gatorade Bolt - with the AFL threatening to fine him $20,000 if he takes the track.


stuffing Dogs.

AFL suck their own ars.

Compensatory incident imo.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2010, 10:53:58 PM »
Its because the AFL is sponsored by Powerade

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2010, 12:18:09 AM »
Its because the AFL is sponsored by Powerade

Yeh Inf but he isn't.

20k gone with no damage compensation because ?

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Deledio in sprint challenge versus Jarryd Hayne and Greg Inglis
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2010, 03:33:33 AM »
AFL players agree to the code of conduct which includes non-compete clauses for major sponsors.

These clauses have stood-up against restriction of trade court arguments.