Author Topic: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)  (Read 2411 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« on: November 09, 2010, 05:15:23 AM »
Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV
Caroline Wilson
November 9, 2010

 
SOME blockbuster AFL games could disappear from free-to-air television and be shown exclusively on pay TV under proposed changes to federal anti-siphoning laws.

In a move that could deliver a big financial boost to the AFL, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has flagged plans to remove at least four games a week from the anti-siphoning list - opening the way for Foxtel to bid directly for those games.

Under the current system, Foxtel has to buy all its games from the free-to-air networks.

In occasionally hostile talks with free-to-air bosses on Friday, Senator Conroy is believed to have said he had no plans to stop blockbuster games from going to pay TV - meaning fans could for the first time be forced to subscribe to Foxtel to watch some of the best matches. Fewer than one-third of Australians now have pay TV.

The Age believes that Senator Conroy clashed with Free TV chairman and former Queensland premier Wayne Goss during the talks, which also involved some furious debate over the broadcast terms for the Australian Open tennis.

However, it was Senator Conroy's revelation that he would not protect the best AFL or NRL games from pay television that most dismayed free-to-air networks Seven, Nine and Ten.

While AFL boss Andrew Demetriou has declared Friday night games will remain on free-to-air, there might be no guarantee that other highly rated games will not go to pay TV.

AFL commercial operations boss Gillon McLachlan refused to comment last night on the impending anti-siphoning decision, but the league remains confident of securing at least $1 billion for its next five-year broadcast deal starting in 2012.

The AFL has long campaigned for restrictions on pay TV to be relaxed in the belief that it could secure a significantly higher sum should Foxtel be free to bid in its own right.

The AFL had hoped to reach a new TV deal by the end of the 2010 season but was forced to delay negotiations until the anti-siphoning decision. That decision has been on hold for political reasons but must be decided by the end of this year.

The Seven and Ten networks are legally bound to make a joint bid for the next rights, and Nine has indicated it will also bid for games. Senator Conroy can add or remove events from the anti-siphoning list at his discretion. There are 10 sports on the list as well as the Olympic and Commonwealth Games.

Another grievance aired last Friday by the networks was their frustration at being prevented from televising listed sports on their secondary digital channels, a rule relaxed during the Commonwealth Games.

Fox Sports has the right to exclusively televise half the AFL's home-and-away games, and the quality of those games has improved significantly on Foxtel's first AFL deal between 2002-6, in which it telecast the lowest-rated matches.

The current deal had Fox Sports paying close to a third of the five-year, $780 million deal when it purchased four games from Seven and Ten.

Those games included one Saturday night fixture and one Sunday twilight game each week during the home-and-away season.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/blockbuster-afl-games-could-be-headed-for-pay-tv-20101108-17ki3.html

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40311
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2010, 07:04:02 AM »
Another grievance aired last Friday by the networks was their frustration at being prevented from televising listed sports on their secondary digital channels, a rule relaxed during the Commonwealth Games.


And seeing you are claiming to know what the outcome of the "anti-siphoning laws" are going to be Caro. What was the outcome on this? You forgotten to mention it  :whistle

Incredibly importnat in the overall scheme of things I would have thought as it is the one way to guarantee more sport on FTA
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2010, 09:30:26 AM »
This could be the thin edge of the wedge, particularly the way that prick Packer is sniffing about but with his foot firmly in the pay TV camp.

You would have thought that the AFL would be wanting to get as many games available to as many people as possible, but in their infinite wisdom they could be going the other way. Short term gain in increased TV revunue could easily be undone in interest dropping off because people cant/wont subscribe to Pay TV and feel the AFL is becoming elitist.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2010, 11:46:04 AM »
millions of australians have got access to PayTV now. the AFL should go for money and its in the best interests of the game that Pay gets big games if its prepared to pay for them.

Offline nahadaman

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 71
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2010, 11:50:59 AM »
Pay TV is going to be the way of the future, as unfortunate as it is.
Get used to it!

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2010, 01:23:33 PM »
Just do the cheapo Foxtel/Austar scam! Makes it affordable.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2010, 01:24:30 PM »
Richmond should look at a partnerships where they have a Foxtel discount subscription package in their memberships.
Go Tigers!

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Get used to paying to watch AFL games on TV, says Eddie (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2010, 03:11:18 PM »
Get used to paying to watch AFL games on TV, says Eddie McGuire
Michael Warner
Herald Sun
November 09, 2010
UPDATE 11.55am:


COLLINGWOOD president Eddie McGuire says footy fans have to get used to the idea of paying to watch their team on TV.
The AFL and Federal Government are refusing to guarantee that the best AFL games will remain on free-to-air television.

As revealed by the Herald Sun last month, more quality AFL matches will handed to pay-TV giant Foxtel under federal reforms expected by Christmas.

McGuire said this morning he expected free-to-air channels to broadcast the best two games of each weekend on Friday and Saturday nights, and Foxtel would have the pick of the rest.

"If you're a footy nut, you probably want to get Foxtel. There's going to be five games on there and sooner or later your team will be on there," McGuire said on Triple M.

"The two best games, I still reckon, will stay on free to air

"One, two, five, six I reckon will still be on free to air and three, four, seven, eight, nine on Foxtel could well be the mix."

McGuire said even his Magpies would get their share of pay-TV games.

"Collingwood had four last year, which is a record for a year, which is not the great draw everyone keeps telling me we've got."

This year Foxtel will broadcast five Pies matches. Richmond will be on pay-TV 11 times and North Melbourne 14 times.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has reportedly told free-to-air network bosses that the days of them getting first preference on all the best games are numbered.

The looming overhaul means Foxtel will choose what it regards as the third and fourth-best games of the week when the league's new round of rights begins in 2012.

Previously, Foxtel had been left with the matches the free-to-air networks do not want.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard has until December 31 to release the Government's crucial Conroy report into what is known as "anti-siphoning".

The report will determine which sporting events are protected for free-to-air stations and whether the AFL can sell matches directly to Foxtel for the first time - a move seen as the league's best chance of securing a $1 billion payday for its 2012-16 package.

Free-to-air stations believe it is already a done deal for at least four AFL games to be taken off the list.

Other anticipated changes will involve the AFL season being divided into A and B-list matches, and networks given the power to select games for broadcast on a rolling basis.

A-list games, including the Collingwood-Essendon Anzac Day clash, Friday night football and all finals, will be protected for telecast by only free-to-air stations.

But up to five B-list- games would be shown on pay-TV each week.

A selection system would give free-to-air networks first crack at the week's first, second, fifth and sixth best games. Foxtel would then have picks 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9.

It is expected all B-list matches will be eligible to be shown on Foxtel or secondary free-to-air digital channels.

Speculation is mounting that the AFL will make it mandatory for all games to be aired live, a move backed by Channel 9.

A new deal is likely to be struck before the start of next season, giving the winning networks a full season to prepare.

Channels 7 and 10 will again bid together with Nine to go alone. Seven and Ten paid $780 million for the current rights - the biggest broadcast rights deal in Australian sporting history.

The anti-siphoning scheme was introduced in 1994 to ensure that events of national importance and cultural significance, such as AFL games and Test cricket matches, were made freely available to the Australian public.

But pay-TV networks have called for a "use it or lose it'' policy to be introduced, saying that the anti-siphoning list lets free-to-air networks hoard sports they don't broadcast.

Free-to-air networks have come under fire for their coverage of recent major sporting events, with viewers complaining of delayed coverage and excessive advertising.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/foxtel-could-be-allowed-to-bid-for-top-afl-games/story-e6frf9jf-1225949731830

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Get used to paying to watch AFL games on TV, says Eddie (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2010, 03:22:16 PM »
"Collingwood had four last year, which is a record for a year, which is not the great draw everyone keeps telling me we've got."

This year Foxtel will broadcast five Pies matches. Richmond will be on pay-TV 11 times and North Melbourne 14 times.

 :lol

Poor Eddie, my heart bleeds!!
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Greens oppose pay-TV sport moves (Age)
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2010, 04:58:41 AM »
Greens oppose pay-TV sport moves
Samantha Lane
November 10, 2010

 
BOB Brown says the Greens will oppose any push to reduce free-to-air television coverage of AFL blockbuster matches, Australian Open tennis and Olympic events because it is not in the public interest.

Senator Brown's comments follow a report in yesterday's Age that federal Communications Minister Stephen Conroy is planning to remove at least four AFL matches a week from the anti-siphoning list, which would give pay television unprecedented power in up-coming football broadcast rights dealings.

The Greens said they would block any move to remove major events from the anti-siphoning list that ensures select competition is screened first on free-to-air television.

Advertisement: Story continues below The revised list is expected to be tabled by Senator Conroy in Parliament next week, and the Greens are advocating that Twenty20 cricket and the European Cup be added to it.

"Australians should not have to pay to watch great sporting events on television," Senator Brown said yesterday.

"We will be urging the Coalition to oppose any new anti-siphoning list that is not in the public interest."

Senator Conroy's office would not elaborate yesterday on The Age's reporting of his discussions last Friday with free-to-air networks.

A spokesperson said: ''The government is currently reviewing the anti-siphoning scheme, including options to facilitate matches being shown live on digital multi-channels, in the event that broadcasters are only offering delayed coverage on their main channel.''

Senator Conroy is understood to have arranged talks today with Channel Seven bosses, and is set to hold discussions with other television chiefs over coming days.

http://www.theage.com.au/national/greens-oppose-paytv-sport-moves-20101109-17m4w.html

FNM

  • Guest
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2010, 01:45:30 PM »
I doubt it.  Blockbuster games generally are on Friday and Saturday nights, and they've got to be free-to-air. The AFL generally want these games to be the best games, so they're not going to schedule dud games on these nights or hand over to pay TV.
I think the status quo will remain - four games on Foxtel, four on pay TV with the blockbusters still remaining on free tv
Even if pay TV get to buy them straight from the AFL, I doubt the AFL will give them the best games.
But who knows with the AFL.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Blockbuster AFL games could be headed for pay TV (Age)
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2010, 03:03:11 PM »
There were plenty of dud friday nighters this year. Ch 7's coverage and flat uninspiring commentary and too many boring Essendon/St Kilda games didn't help either. I can see the AFL eventually going down the same route as the NRL and have 6 week block fixtures where the draw eeach weekend can be altered to have the biggest two games live on the Friday and Saturday night.

Let's hope by the time this all happens Richmond are finally on the up and getting plenty of the FTA live primetime blockbusters. FTA = publicity which builds fan bases and attracts $$$ sponsorships.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd