Correct me if wrong, but wasnt the goal umpire was convinced enough with the decision to already signal a goal? And It wasn't until the north players got in his face (in a pack) claiming one of the injustices of the century that he then asked field umpire Mc.Ballsack for a review?
That being the case, the north players had plenty to do with it, if not, we're the reason why it was reviewed.
Nope.
Just watched the replay
and goal ump says to Ump No24 "I am sure it's a goal, I'm sure it's a goal but please have it reveiwed"
Nuffer No24 then says "Goal umpire believes it's a goal but wants it reveiwed"
Players can do what they like but they cannot ask let alone demand for a review. Go back to our game against Melb and the White goal - there was no review there despite us claiming "injustices of the century" too
It was the umps call and the umps call only. Notice a few times that they are getting things out of order though. I rekcon it is at least the 3rd time in the past fortnight the field nuffer has given the all clear, a goals been signalled and then a reviews been called for