Author Topic: The Ratten Precedent  (Read 3180 times)

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14258
Re: The Ratten Precedent
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2012, 12:05:08 PM »
might as well sack dimma now

you serious? what for.

he should be given 5 years, after all we  gave spud and leather face 5 yrs and how pathetic were they

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Big Papa Bear

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: The Ratten Precedent
« Reply #16 on: August 31, 2012, 02:17:02 PM »
Hardwick started with almost nothing and has built the list to a competitive unit.

Next step is to complete the development of more youngsters and recruit key position players - and we are there!

He also needs to improve his tactics / game plan to be more versatile with the loss of key players - i.e. Hawks lose a player and its one soldier in, one soldier out

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The Ratten Precedent
« Reply #17 on: August 31, 2012, 05:00:52 PM »
might as well sack dimma now

you serious? what for.

he should be given 5 years, after all we  gave spud and leather face 5 yrs and how pathetic were they

 :fishing

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: The Ratten Precedent
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2012, 06:58:33 PM »
Could I just clarify what the precedent is here;

A coach getting sacked?
A experienced coach not currently employed?
A team expected to make the finals and doesn't?

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: The Ratten Precedent
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2012, 07:09:37 PM »
Could I just clarify what the precedent is here;

A coach getting sacked?
A experienced coach not currently employed?
A team expected to make the finals and doesn't?
The scenario whereby a young Coach is replaced short of his final contracted year (after stalled development) by a proven, older Coach....very verbose I know :-[ I suppose what I'm saying is: Get Roos and pay out Dimma if we don't improve next year.  ;)

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: The Ratten Precedent
« Reply #20 on: September 01, 2012, 09:07:54 AM »
Could I just clarify what the precedent is here;

A coach getting sacked?
A experienced coach not currently employed?
A team expected to make the finals and doesn't?

Read the op again you retread, pretty self explanatory