Main
Forum
Fixture
History
Premierships
Honour Roll
Team of the Century
Draft History
Memorabilia
Multimedia
Links
Email
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum
Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Home
Help
Login
Register
One-Eyed Richmond Forum
»
Football
»
Richmond Rant
»
Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on? (Read 1267 times)
one-eyed
Administrator
RFC Hall of Fame
Posts: 98244
Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
on:
September 30, 2013, 04:40:45 PM »
The Herald-Sun gave us 7/10.
RICHMOND
IN
Chris Knights (Adel), Troy Chaplin (PA), Aaron Edwards (NM)
OUT
Angus Graham (Adel)
DRAFT PICKS:
9 (Nick Vlastuin), 31 (Kamdyn McIntosh), 33 (Liam McBean), 42 (Matt McDonough)
VERDICT:
Can’t fault any of the Tigers’ changes. They never looked like losing sleep over Graham, while Chaplin was a massive get. Edwards played an important role towards the backend of the year, while Knights looked OK before injury struck. Vlastuin is the only draftee we can make an early call on and for a teenager to come in and cement a place in a finals side speaks volumes for his potential. Tigers recruiters identified him as their main target a long way out from the draft and got their man.
RATING:
7/10
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/what-changes-did-your-afl-club-make-to-its-list-last-year-check-them-out-and-reassess-their-success/story-fnfll94y-1226729983108?from=trendinglinks
Logged
Andyy
RFC Hall of Fame
Posts: 9979
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #1 on:
September 30, 2013, 04:47:47 PM »
Excellent work IMO. Can't really fault it at all.
Chaplin awesome pickup.
A Edwards we got for basically nothing and he was worth it.
Knights was looking great but you can't predict knee reco's like that.
Vlastuin also sensational for a first year player.
Lots if good feedback about McBean.
Hopefully another solid year of trading/drafting and we'll be much better off IMO.
Logged
tony_montana
Guest
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #2 on:
September 30, 2013, 04:50:05 PM »
Hopefully the other draftees come on, we need some 2nd, 3rd and 4th round draftees to step up and become regulars. Talking about Mcbean, McIntosh, Astbury, Batchelor, Helbig, Elton etc - those types
Logged
wayne
Fame of Hall
RFC Hall of Fame
Posts: 8464
In Absentia
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #3 on:
September 30, 2013, 04:52:42 PM »
McBean : Red-headed pick 9 terrorises AFL, wait till they get a load of me!
Logged
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do
Owl
Magnificent Bastard
RFC Hall of Fame
Posts: 7012
Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #4 on:
September 30, 2013, 09:43:27 PM »
I reckon we got some gooduns in that lot, once the beanster hits the bigtime and I had hopes for McIntosh as well.
Logged
Lots of people name their swords......
the claw
Guest
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #5 on:
October 01, 2013, 12:01:37 AM »
just too early to say.
while i thought we failed to take enough genuine mids i thought the processes we took were good.
we used good picks on kids in the nd and we bought in mature players cheaply either in f/a cheap trade or rookie. i think the balance in numbers between kids taken and mature players taken was pretty good.
i think the quality of our mature rookie picks left a lot to be desired.
i also think we failed to address pressing list needs.
Logged
Darth Tiger
RFC Hall of Fame
Posts: 1127
Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #6 on:
October 01, 2013, 02:00:25 AM »
The real test will be when the RFC starts needing to trade players out to significantly improve the draft position & total list - and that starts with this trade period.
Logged
tdy
RFC Hall of Fame
Posts: 2481
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #7 on:
October 01, 2013, 01:38:48 PM »
Hey i voted a 2 being great, crappola. Can I revote!
The 4 experienced players traded was great. we got rid of Graham and got a half back in Chaplin.
And of the 4 draft kids you just never know after 12 months.
Logged
lamington
RFC Hall of Fame
Posts: 2873
For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #8 on:
October 01, 2013, 02:15:20 PM »
The mature aged recruits were good. We got them for virtually nothing.
Not too sure about the drafts namely the Mc-brigade but at the very least all signs point to the beanstalk being a great player for the Tigers.
We really need a Jack and the Bean attack to give Rough and Gunston a run for their money
Logged
Hellenic Tiger
Guest
Re: Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?
«
Reply #9 on:
October 01, 2013, 10:29:15 PM »
Hopefully McDonough plays some more senior footy in 2014 as McIntosh, McBean.
Orren was great as back up ruck. Did what was asked of him and did it well most of the time.
Edwards did a job but I didn't expect much more than that and Vlas will play 200 games plus for us and be a very valuable player.
I am hoping that blokes like Arnot, Elton, O'Hanlon step up and play consistent senior footy next year and give the 2011 draft a slight boost in ranking.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
One-Eyed Richmond Forum
»
Football
»
Richmond Rant
»
Rating last year's recruiting 12 months on?