Author Topic: Geelong, GWS, Adelaide and Melbourne corresponded with ASADA (H-Sun)  (Read 1107 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 96257
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Investigation reveals secret ASADA whistleblowers

    Peter Mickelburough
    From: Sunday Herald Sun
    October 20, 2013


SECRET AFL sources have been corresponding with the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, documents obtained by the Sunday Herald Sun under Freedom of Information laws reveal.

The documents also reveal that Geelong, Greater Western Sydney and Adelaide all contacted ASADA over concerns about prohibited substances before the 2013 season.

Melbourne also called ASADA over doping worries four rounds into the season. But ASADA refuses to say what concerns were raised by the clubs or release details of their correspondence.

After a six-month Freedom of Information battle for doping-related correspondence between the authority and the AFL, its clubs and players, ASADA released just three partial documents to the Sunday Herald Sun, despite initially identifying 2444 relevant documents and putting a $16,619.40 price tag on vetting them.

Two of the partially released documents are copies of the media announcement of the Switkowski Report into the Essendon doping scandal.

The third was a January 18 email from the Adelaide Crows seeking a list of prohibited substances. The secret sources and the clubs with doping issues are identified in a schedule of just 13 documents ASADA eventually deemed relevant to the Sunday Herald Sun request.

Access to two of those documents, an August 12 email between "*" and ASADA and a May 16 email between Essendon and ASADA was denied because they involved a "confidential informant".

ASADA spokesman Rohan Lindeman declined to say how many whistleblowers ASADA has in the ranks of the AFL, or give any indication of the type of doping concerns raised by the clubs.

"ASADA does not discuss the operational details of its anti-doping program," he said.

"This correspondence (with the AFL clubs) is confidential and ASADA cannot comment any further."

Geelong is listed as telephoning ASADA twice on February 8 - three days after Essendon asked ASADA to investigate its supplements program.

GWS called once that day and Melbourne once on April 23. The calls are recorded in six pages of secret documents.

There were also eight emails between Essendon and ASADA between February 27 and July 26, including the two relating to the Switkowski Report announcement and a third relating to the "confidential informant".

The Sunday Herald Sun initially sought all correspondence on prohibited performance enhancing drugs between ASADA and the AFL; AFL clubs; AFL club staff or contractors; and AFL players, from January 1, 2012 to March 13, 2013.

After receiving an estimated $16,619.40 processing charge the Sunday Herald Sun sought to reduce the scope of the request by limiting it to correspondence involving ASADA's Investigations and Intelligence Services branch and its Legal Services and Results Management branch and excluding all non-positive drug tests.

ASADA rejected this request, saying it was too voluminous, with an estimated 600-plus relevant documents.

The doping authority then agreed to process a request that omitted its correspondence with the AFL, with a preliminary search identifying 309 documents within the scope of the request and estimating the processing cost at $567.

However, a month later ASADA said it had identified just 13 relevant documents and, with 10 of those deemed exempt from release and the other three partially exempt, the charges were dropped.

ASADA determined the release, or full release, of the documents would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest.

Essendon remains under investigation by ASADA.

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/investigation-reveals-secret-asada-whistleblowers/story-fnelctok-1226743125238

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2445
Re: Geelong, GWS, Adelaide and Melbourne corresponded with ASADA (H-Sun)
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2013, 08:55:16 PM »
Someones played bureaucratic football like a chess grand master.  Would've been funny seeing the Editors face go red at the Hun when they said it'd cost $16K.