Author Topic: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)  (Read 1030 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond has been the most accurate set shot team in the competition, having kicked at 67.4 per cent putting it just ahead of Hawthorn (67.2) and the Sydney Swans (67.0) in 2014.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-07-22/the-leagues-best-sharpshooters

 :o

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2014, 12:53:33 PM »
Not counting the Melbourne game?

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2014, 02:58:52 PM »
Tigers to kick 4:15 on Friday vs WC ;)

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2014, 02:31:12 PM »
Percentage is meaningless in this case.

Sure Richmond is on 67.4 ahead of Hawthorn 67.2 and Sydney 67.0

But the Tigers have only kicked 1399pts vs hawthorn (1826) and Swans (1547)

The real take home message should be that Hawthorn have been able to get the ball into Bruest and Gunston's hands so many times and as a result slot it through the big sticks. 80-90% of the time.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2014, 03:21:16 PM »
Percentage is meaningless in this case.

Sure Richmond is on 67.4 ahead of Hawthorn 67.2 and Sydney 67.0

But the Tigers have only kicked 1399pts vs hawthorn (1826) and Swans (1547)

The real take home message should be that Hawthorn have been able to get the ball into Bruest and Gunston's hands so many times and as a result slot it through the big sticks. 80-90% of the time.

Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2014, 04:12:43 PM »
Accuracy percentage goes up when you only try to score once in a while
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2014, 06:09:33 PM »
Percentage is meaningless in this case.

Sure Richmond is on 67.4 ahead of Hawthorn 67.2 and Sydney 67.0

But the Tigers have only kicked 1399pts vs hawthorn (1826) and Swans (1547)

The real take home message should be that Hawthorn have been able to get the ball into Bruest and Gunston's hands so many times and as a result slot it through the big sticks. 80-90% of the time.

If that happened 80-90% of the time their percentage would be 80-90%  ;D

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2014, 07:00:36 PM »
Percentage is meaningless in this case.

Sure Richmond is on 67.4 ahead of Hawthorn 67.2 and Sydney 67.0

But the Tigers have only kicked 1399pts vs hawthorn (1826) and Swans (1547)

The real take home message should be that Hawthorn have been able to get the ball into Bruest and Gunston's hands so many times and as a result slot it through the big sticks. 80-90% of the time.

If that happened 80-90% of the time their percentage would be 80-90%  ;D

:lol true. The 'problem' lies in the rest of the team's ability to take set shots. I use the term 'problem' because it's not like they're struggling to put goals on the scoreboard.
 
Similarly Tony Lockett's set shot % was something ridiculously good. Unfortunately not all of St.K/Sydney were as good from a set shot.

Which brings me to the question, why do you think Jack's set shot accuracy has been crap this year? He's normally gun-barrel straight
« Last Edit: July 23, 2014, 08:35:46 PM by WilliamPowell »

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2014, 07:34:32 PM »
Stats are great, Edwards is having his best year at the club..... :whistle
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2014, 09:23:35 PM »
You're stuffen kidding me , we lost to syd and freo with jr kicking like 10 points in a fortnight  :banghead
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2014, 09:53:53 PM »
Percentage is meaningless in this case.

Sure Richmond is on 67.4 ahead of Hawthorn 67.2 and Sydney 67.0

But the Tigers have only kicked 1399pts vs hawthorn (1826) and Swans (1547)

The real take home message should be that Hawthorn have been able to get the ball into Bruest and Gunston's hands so many times and as a result slot it through the big sticks. 80-90% of the time.

If that happened 80-90% of the time their percentage would be 80-90%  ;D

:lol true. The 'problem' lies in the rest of the team's ability to take set shots. I use the term 'problem' because it's not like they're struggling to put goals on the scoreboard.
 
Similarly Tony Lockett's set shot % was something ridiculously good. Unfortunately not all of St.K/Sydney were as good from a set shot.

Which brings me to the question, why do you think Jack's set shot accuracy has been crap this year? He's normally gun-barrel straight

Wish there was an answer to why he's kicking stuffed because you used to be able to back him every time now you just sit and hope

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #11 on: July 25, 2014, 03:43:15 PM »
Martin and Lids have iffy set shots as well. On the run from outside the 50 you'd back them 999/1000. But 40m out on a slight angle and they seem to have trouble slotting it through the middle.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2014, 04:15:02 PM »
I reckon Lids has an ugly looking set shot at goal, looks like he tries to replicate a running shot on goal

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #13 on: July 25, 2014, 07:30:34 PM »
I reckon Lids has an ugly looking set shot at goal, looks like he tries to replicate a running shot on goal

I agree, he has this weird swinging from right to left action like he's trying to take a free kick in soccer. I'm thinking maybe because he tries to kick the skin off the ball when really he just needs to slot it (although his set shot against Port was fantastic even though the kicking action was weird)?

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Richmond is the most accurate set-shot team in 2014 (afl site)
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2014, 02:48:14 AM »
I reckon Lids has an ugly looking set shot at goal, looks like he tries to replicate a running shot on goal

I agree, he has this weird swinging from right to left action like he's trying to take a free kick in soccer. I'm thinking maybe because he tries to kick the skin off the ball when really he just needs to slot it (although his set shot against Port was fantastic even though the kicking action was weird)?

Yeah looks like he tries to hammer it through every time. Saying that I reckon Schultz set shot is ugly but he doesn't miss too often so I guess it depends how it works for the individual