Author Topic: Rance  (Read 575 times)

Offline sugark

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Rance
« on: April 25, 2015, 10:52:30 PM »
Rance never looked comfortable last night with a moving opponent, Hogan just constantly moved around and never allowed Rance to watch the play unfold as a stationary back.  These tactics never allowed Rance to read the play and be the intercept machine he has been, it also made him look vulnerable in one on ones.

As a side either sign or advise the club of your intentions to enable us to be involved in the back room negotiations for uncontracted players from other clubs with his money.  All the articles this week are also proving to be a unnecessary distraction.

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2252
Re: Rance
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2015, 11:11:13 PM »
A question should be why they didn't change Ashby and Rance

Offline Canoworms

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rance
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2015, 11:27:42 PM »
If nothing else Friday night may have "clarified" the worth of Rance.

Online georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3823
Re: Rance
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2015, 05:29:44 AM »
That's what you called being out coached by the other team.

Online Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2450
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: Rance
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2015, 07:51:07 AM »
A question should be why they didn't change Ashby and Rance

That is what I kept saying to the tv as well. Seemed obvious to me.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Offline Zlatan

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rance
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2015, 12:46:40 PM »
If nothing else Friday night may have "clarified" the worth of Rance.

i didnt watch the melbourne game

but i been watching rance for a long time

and his worth is clarified already imo

Offline Bengal

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
  • Its Tiger Time
Re: Rance
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2015, 01:19:30 PM »
lost $100,000 off his contract on that performance.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Rance
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2015, 01:27:53 PM »
There's already a Rance thread.

Also Rance does usually play well against moving forwards (see Reiwoldt and Buddy). Was just an off game for him

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9221
Re: Rance
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2015, 04:41:22 PM »
Worth every penny of $600,000

$700,000 pushing it

$800,000 overs if you want to pinch him from RFC


Truth is he looked distracted and off his game Friday night. Guess I'm disappointed but it's pretty rough picking on him of all people...

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Rance
« Reply #9 on: April 26, 2015, 07:00:27 PM »
A question should be why they didn't change Ashby and Rance
I tjought of that too, maybe thought rance could fight back
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled