Author Topic: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)  (Read 2366 times)

Online one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97375
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« on: September 04, 2015, 03:21:07 AM »
THE 2015 RELEVANCE LADDER

Victoria's most prominent clubs, based on support and digital following

Team         Ave crowd  membership Twitter Facebook TV audience Total
Collingwood    48,706    75,037    75,550    316,514    764,466    1,280,273
Hawthorn       43,706    72,924    59,448    280,464    718,983    1,175,525
Essendon       42,103    60,818    74,769    305,884    627,703    1,111,277
Richmond       48,891    70,809    52,717    183,535    749,000    1,104,952
Carlton          35,967    47,305    67,296    226,560    639,699    1,016,827
Geelong         34,946    44,312    53,127    147,823    642,681    922,889
Nth Melb        26,754    41,012    36,616    103,559    589,657    797,598
St Kilda          26,439    32,746    38,591    132,020    382,512    612,308
W. Bulldogs    26,564    35,222    30,875    91,310    400,935    584,906
Melbourne       30,377    35,953    37,253    84,338    374,901    562,822

Data supplied by Bastion

----------------------------------------------------

Is your AFL club 'relevant' in 2015? We have the answer

  Jon Pierik
    The Age
    September 4, 2015


When it comes to supporters of the traditionally big Melbourne clubs, it seems regardless of on-field performance, they are guaranteed strong support, television audiences and social-media engagement.

How else do you explain that of the top six sides on the AFL "relevance ladder", compiled by sports marketing agency Bastion Group, two of the top three - Collingwood and Essendon - have not made the finals, while Carlton, after a year of turmoil, comfortably sits in sixth position? Indeed, Geelong, another side not to make the finals, was seventh.

The relevance ladder takes into account average attendances, 2015 membership, followers on Twitter and Facebook and average television audiences, although some clubs have questioned the depth of investigation.

Melbourne sits last in terms of Victorian-based clubs but has bristled at the figures, declaring they do not represent the wide coverage the club and high-profile coach Paul Roos have enjoyed through traditional media this season, pointing to the successful Big Freeze campaign the club helped to organise for former coach Neale Daniher's bid to raise awareness for motor neurone disease.

The Demons say they rank ninth overall for club website audiences, no.1 overall for page impressions per member, while their backdrops featuring club sponsors at press conferences have enjoyed strong recognition. Other clubs have questioned why there was no breakdown of club website figures, with one media chief suggesting the social media figures were "misleading" as they did show how many times a supporter had "engaged" with the club.

According to Bastion, the Demons had greater crowds and membership than the Western Bulldogs, and more Twitter followers, but fell away on Facebook and average television audiences to ultimately be at the bottom of Victorian-based clubs.

Bastion director Jack Watts said the Demons occupied a "niche, affluent space" but this traditional affluence could morph into major dollars flowing into the club.

The Bulldogs were the lowest performing Victorian-based club last year as their slow but methodical on-field rebuild continued. However, such is the tough fight to make inroads in a market where family allegiances extend through generations, the Bulldogs have jumped just the one spot in a year despite emerging as the feel-good story of the season and enjoying greater coverage through traditional media.

Dubbed the "Harlem Globetrotters" of the AFL by some commentators because of their attacking and exciting play, the Bulldogs have secured their first finals berth since 2010, and have some believing they can cause a premiership boilover.

Bastion, which has former AFL chief Andrew Demetriou as a director, points out that the Bulldogs continue to struggle on social media but their average crowds, membership and television audience are higher than St Kilda's - which finished one spot ahead on the relevance ladder - and their heartland has much scope to grow in financial terms.

Overall, Watts said "there weren't really any major surprises" in the data which reinforced the cycle where big clubs, already with healthy support, can enjoy better financial resourcing and prominence in Friday night and Saturday night timeslots, which has the two-fold effect of having their sponsorship worth more, and the chance to increase their supporter base. For this reason, Watts said equalisation measures were so important.

"We have the cap on club spending but we really haven't addressed the cause in how we fundamentally get more people to support these (lower-ranked) clubs," he said.

"That ties into the broadcast rights agreement and that needs to be a watershed to secure the commercial future of every club in the game."

North Melbourne has made the finals for a second-straight season and, like the Bulldogs, enjoy an attacking style of play. However, they still remain among the lower rungs of the relevance ladder, reinforcing how difficult it is for clubs with historically modest supporter bases to grow.

It's no surprise the Magpies and Hawks lead the relevance ladder despite Richmond averaging higher crowds. As Bastion reports, the Magpies social media numbers "are off the chart".

That the Magpies can afford to invest $1 million into their own television studio, and provide such things as slick club documentaries, provides the club with a major advantage in terms of tailoring specific content to their supporters. The Hawks also have their own - more modest - studio.

The Tigers are a growing power and their hold is only likely to grow should they win their first final this year since 2001.

The Blues are an intriguing case study. While their crowds and membership are well off the top four sides, they had more Twitter and Facebook engagement than the Tigers and their average television audiences weren't too far behind the Hawks.

The same can be said about the Bombers. Record membership and healthy average attendances (although these dipped as the season unfolded and coach James Hird left) combined with Twitter and Facebook numbers second only to Collingwood show supporters have remained engaged despite the struggles on the field and the on-going supplements scandal.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/is-your-afl-club-relevant-in-2015-we-have-the-answer-20150902-gjdipe.html

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58582
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2015, 04:12:36 AM »
Social media sites where you can have multiple aliases and accounts are so reliable for these surveys - NOT!  ::). Take away those Facebook numbers are we jump up to 2nd spot. It's crowds, memberships and TV audiences that bring the sponsors and the $$$ to clubs.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2015, 07:16:17 AM »
Tindler
Instagram
Ashleymadison.
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2015, 07:48:29 AM »
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2015, 07:57:10 AM »
Yeah right, we re the biggest by far, and it hasn't even started yet  :shh
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1340
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2015, 09:27:47 AM »
Social media sites where you can have multiple aliases and accounts are so reliable for these surveys - NOT!  ::). Take away those Facebook numbers are we jump up to 2nd spot. It's crowds, memberships and TV audiences that bring the sponsors and the $$$ to clubs.

And need to consider the age demographic of the Tiger supporters. Plenty of supporters 40+ which is not a demographic for Facebook users especially the males.

Start winning premierships and see the kids jump on board and social media stats sky rocket

Offline yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2015, 11:20:03 AM »
The Age is becoming the an irrelevant newspaper.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2015, 12:13:22 PM »
Chuck Ashley Maddison up there and Melbourne would be in front
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Richmond is the 4th most 'relevant' club in Victoria .... (Age)
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2015, 01:08:51 PM »
Or hawthorn
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus