It actually shows how pointless it is use the term 1st, 2nd etc rounder.
there is a big difference between 26 and 6, but using these terms make them sound similar.
I know it suits the emos to do this, but in most years pick 26 would be a 2nd rounder, often not even an early one, but lets get pedantic and argue that in this particular year it is a first rounder so that the pick is somehow more valuable than in a year the same pick is a mid second rounder.
Picks over 20 go at a success rate of about 30% regardless of at what pick the first team gets their second selection