Author Topic: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side  (Read 2744 times)

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2016, 06:53:46 PM »
This must finally shred the lingering delusion (for some) that we have a promising list.  Markov, Rioli and daylight to the rest. I didn't count Menadue because he will ask to be traded to the dogs at the end of this contract.......mark my words. They were very close to selecting him at the pick prior to ours.

This the same Menadue who signed a 2 year contract extension on the 5th July 2016, a little over 2 months ago

yeah right

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #16 on: September 14, 2016, 07:04:07 PM »
This must finally shred the lingering delusion (for some) that we have a promising list.  Markov, Rioli and daylight to the rest. I didn't count Menadue because he will ask to be traded to the dogs at the end of this contract.......mark my words. They were very close to selecting him at the pick prior to ours.

This the same Menadue who signed a 2 year contract extension on the 5th July 2016, a little over 2 months ago

yeah right
:clapping
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2016, 08:49:52 PM »
This must finally shred the lingering delusion (for some) that we have a promising list.  Markov, Rioli and daylight to the rest. I didn't count Menadue because he will ask to be traded to the dogs at the end of this contract.......mark my words. They were very close to selecting him at the pick prior to ours.

This the same Menadue who signed a 2 year contract extension on the 5th July 2016, a little over 2 months ago

yeah right
your scepticism is understandable but I stand by my prediction.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #18 on: September 15, 2016, 07:12:46 PM »
laird, docherty, coniglio,  all turn 23 this yr   wasn't it supposed to be an UNDER 22 team.

naturaldisaster

  • Guest
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #19 on: September 15, 2016, 11:13:30 PM »
The majority of kids on ourl ist played less than 10 games.

The most was Rioli with 18 who at least got a rising star.

The lowest amount of games from the actual team was 17 and all but one (petracca) have already had a couple of years experience.

Look at hte average games played from the players in the under 22 team, compared to our under 22s this year.... and that is why we didn't get anyone in the team.



tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2016, 01:29:23 PM »
The majority of kids on ourl ist played less than 10 games.

The most was Rioli with 18 who at least got a rising star.

The lowest amount of games from the actual team was 17 and all but one (petracca) have already had a couple of years experience.

Look at hte average games played from the players in the under 22 team, compared to our under 22s this year.... and that is why we didn't get anyone in the team.

Understand that - but when you ask yourself, why are we in the position where most of our under 22's dont have the experience you start to question the list management strategy we've had in place over the past few years. Watsed way too many spots on the list (and rookie list) on mature types

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2016, 01:34:19 PM »
How were hardwick and the brains trust to know we were locked and loaded with blanks and the cream on top hadn't been stored in the fridge and was off. 
Does anyone have half an idea on anything?

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2016, 01:57:29 PM »
The majority of kids on ourl ist played less than 10 games.

The most was Rioli with 18 who at least got a rising star.

The lowest amount of games from the actual team was 17 and all but one (petracca) have already had a couple of years experience.

Look at hte average games played from the players in the under 22 team, compared to our under 22s this year.... and that is why we didn't get anyone in the team.

Understand that - but when you ask yourself, why are we in the position where most of our under 22's dont have the experience you start to question the list management strategy we've had in place over the past few years. Watsed way too many spots on the list (and rookie list) on mature types

but at least we got to witness newman a moore townsend grigg morris pettard marcon 
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2016, 07:36:33 PM »
Because they don't move the ball like professionals they are all over looked & judged how stupid they look when they freeze up when touched. Several senior players do the same so no wonder no-one is looked at.  :snidegrin

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98244
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2016, 07:45:32 PM »
laird, docherty, coniglio,  all turn 23 this yr   wasn't it supposed to be an UNDER 22 team.
They all turn 23 post this season.


To be eligible for selection, players must be aged 22 or under for the entire AFL season (including finals).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/22_Under_22_team

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2480
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2016, 09:19:45 PM »

+1 to that but we played finals 3 times in a row. Haven't done that for 35 years.
The majority of kids on ourl ist played less than 10 games.

The most was Rioli with 18 who at least got a rising star.

The lowest amount of games from the actual team was 17 and all but one (petracca) have already had a couple of years experience.

Look at hte average games played from the players in the under 22 team, compared to our under 22s this year.... and that is why we didn't get anyone in the team.

Understand that - but when you ask yourself, why are we in the position where most of our under 22's dont have the experience you start to question the list management strategy we've had in place over the past few years. Watsed way too many spots on the list (and rookie list) on mature types

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: No Tigers in the Best 22 Under 22 side
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2016, 09:20:39 PM »

+1 to that but we played finals 3 times in a row. Haven't done that for 35 years.
The majority of kids on ourl ist played less than 10 games.

The most was Rioli with 18 who at least got a rising star.

The lowest amount of games from the actual team was 17 and all but one (petracca) have already had a couple of years experience.

Look at hte average games played from the players in the under 22 team, compared to our under 22s this year.... and that is why we didn't get anyone in the team.

Understand that - but when you ask yourself, why are we in the position where most of our under 22's dont have the experience you start to question the list management strategy we've had in place over the past few years. Watsed way too many spots on the list (and rookie list) on mature types

Captain obvious has entered the building