Tylar Young [merged]

[taztiger4]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

no idea, I thought it may have been Seth

BTW, Young has played more AFL games that the 2 you mention combined , not sure why you or anyone else finds them that good TBH

You could argue Campbell potentially, but blight? He’s been at the club 6 months and played 3 games. For all Young’s faults, he’s certainly ahead of blight on the pecking order and that’s no fault on blight, he just hasn’t had the game time yet.

oops, misread that, thought WP was saying Campbell Gray

[Tiger Khosh]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

Spot on. Seems like a strange decision given where he is at

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

Prior to Young’s elevation, I counted 27 on the main list which meant we had to add 9 players just to meet minimum primary list requirement number of 36.

Unless we are eyeing a recycled player in the preseason draft, even using all 8 of the draft picks we currently have would have seen us fallen 1 player short.

So the elevation of 1 player seemed an absolute must to get us to 28. If we use all 8 of our draft picks that will see us get to 36 on the primary list and meet the minimum requirement. If we do any 2 for 1 pick trades or trade into next years draft, then we’ll need to elevate more players from our rookie list.

[PremiershipClock]

Am I missing something about Tylar Young? Bog average

[Diocletian]

Should've been downgraded to delisted. Dud.