Author Topic: Tylar Young [merged]  (Read 29457 times)

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #195 on: November 13, 2024, 10:50:21 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

no idea, I thought it may have been Seth

BTW, Young has played more AFL games that the 2 you mention combined , not sure why you or anyone else finds them that good TBH

You could argue Campbell potentially, but blight? He’s been at the club 6 months and played 3 games. For all Young’s faults, he’s certainly ahead of blight on the pecking order and that’s no fault on blight, he just hasn’t had the game time yet.

oops, misread that, thought WP was saying Campbell Gray :)

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4410
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #196 on: November 13, 2024, 11:02:05 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

Spot on. Seems like a strange decision given where he is at

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

Prior to Young’s elevation, I counted 27 on the main list which meant we had to add 9 players just to meet minimum primary list requirement number of 36.

Unless we are eyeing a recycled player in the preseason draft, even using all 8 of the draft picks we currently have would have seen us fallen 1 player short.

So the elevation of 1 player seemed an absolute must to get us to 28. If we use all 8 of our draft picks that will see us get to 36 on the primary list and meet the minimum requirement. If we do any 2 for 1 pick trades or trade into next years draft, then we’ll need to elevate more players from our rookie list.

Offline PremiershipClock

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 84
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #197 on: Yesterday at 09:59:26 AM »
Am I missing something about Tylar Young? Bog average

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19395
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #198 on: Yesterday at 12:26:09 PM »
Should've been downgraded to delisted. Dud. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.