i have been totally oppposed to sugar as our captain because of all the obvious reasons. he isnt a matchwinner, his skill level is only slightly better than tivendales, his lack of charisma, as his lack in making big impacts on games
but
as we have seen over the past 6 weeks he really has stepped up and stuck to his task, im his biggest critic, ask MT!, but what he has shown this yr is that he is disciplined and authoritive and been a good teacher on and off the feild to the young ones. i always stated and wanted joel to be captain, but whats the point of making a change now, the only choice we have is sugar or joel. so say we swap captains next yr and make a change, joel becomes captain, then every time he shanks a kick we will say he is a dud too, because joel 4 as good as he is , at times snuffs them just as bad as sugar. its time we stop worrying about who should be captain, sugar should be captain for 2 more yrs at least, maybe 3 depending on circumstances.
this is what i would do, next yr.2007, keep the currant captain and vice captains.
in 2008, keep sugar as captain, joel as vice captain and drop richo and brown and replace them two with say deledio and tambling.
in 2009, drop joel as vc for say polo, pattison, raines, etc, any other kid who has developed into a leadership type. and then assess whether deledio(or another young leader) is ready to take over sugar or not, if he or someone else is fine, if not sugar stays one more yr tuil 2010, when a change will be made.
this a imo a good transition to change captain, and introdice potential captains to our club