Author Topic: Plough provides the answers (RFC site)  (Read 1082 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Plough provides the answers (RFC site)
« on: March 15, 2007, 01:48:47 PM »
Plough provides the answers
richmondfc.com.au
15th March, 2007

How did you assess last Saturday’s practice match against Melbourne?

* Lack of experience (on avg 3 years and 32 games less)
* Poor goal conversion
* Played 2 good quarters, 2 poor ones
* 6 of Melbourne's 8 first half goals came from our turnovers. Over-handballing and running ourselves into trouble.
* B+ for intensity and work ethic. D- for finishing skills.

From an individual perspective, what were some of the positives out of the game?

* Petts took 14 marks
* Tucky and Foley got heaps of it but didn't use the footy well.
* Meyer played the first half in the curtain raiser then kicked 2 and assisted in another in a 2nd quarter spark.
* Newy and Rainesy continued to impress at HB
* Schulz took 7 marks. Should have kicked 4 and not just 2.
* King solid on Aaron Davey
* Polak showed he can play at either end. Will play defence when Richo and Simmo come back.
* Special mention to McGuane.

Who was prominent from a Richmond perspective in the Coburg Tigers intra-club curtain-raiser to the main game last Saturday?

* Paddy with 7 goals. People would say he should as a mature player dominated but we got him cheap in the draft.
* Tambo played because he didn't realise training was on. It was a mistake but we have rules. Head and shoulders above the rest which is someone he hasn't done at VFL level before.

How did some of the Richmond newcomers go in the early game?

* Edwards kicked goal of the year and did some nice cameos. Sees in the next couple of years Edwards and Riewoldt turning 4 nice things into 8-9 to 15 nice things per game.
* Collins also impressed again.

Full article at: http://richmondfc.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6301/Default.aspx?newsId=39216

letsgetiton!

  • Guest
Re: Plough provides the answers (RFC site)
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2007, 06:13:02 PM »
interesting how a couple of our players played in the reserves game 1st then the main game.
screw the score, and the skill errors can be rectified. we will go ok , im sure of it.
terry isnt spin doctoring, just telling it how it is, and he does not seem, scared , fazed or worried .
he is a man in control

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40321
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Plough provides the answers (RFC site)
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2007, 10:09:04 PM »
interesting how a couple of our players played in the reserves game 1st then the main game.

They guys who played in the first game only played a half of that game and basically a half the main game. The CLub did that because of the heat

They were for memory:

Meyer
McGuane
Jackson
Hughes


* 6 of Melbourne's 8 first half goals came from our turnovers. Over-handballing and running ourselves into trouble.

Looked bad didn't realise it was that bad  ;D

Quote
* B+ for intensity and work ethic. D- for finishing skills.

Pretty accurate, although I'd probably given a B- for intensity - only because some guys looked so flat

"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

letsgetiton!

  • Guest
Re: Plough provides the answers (RFC site)
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2007, 10:54:43 AM »
interesting how a couple of our players played in the reserves game 1st then the main game.

They guys who played in the first game only played a half of that game and basically a half the main game. The CLub did that because of the heat

They were for memory:

Meyer
McGuane
Jackson
Hughes


* 6 of Melbourne's 8 first half goals came from our turnovers. Over-handballing and running ourselves into trouble.

Looked bad didn't realise it was that bad  ;D

Quote
* B+ for intensity and work ethic. D- for finishing skills.

Pretty accurate, although I'd probably given a B- for intensity - only because some guys looked so flat



cheers wp!