Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
The case for the defenceMartin Blake | May 31, 2007 | The AgeThere has been a tendency over the past year to suggest that the Western Bulldogs, with their run and carry from defence and their quick scoring, have reinvented the way Australian football should be played.But on the evidence thus far, it is an idealistic view. Manuka produced the weekend's most significant game in some ways as the two disparate game-plans went head-to-head. The Bulldogs are great to watch at their best, to be sure, but in the kind of tight, in-close, accountable game that Sydney produced in Canberra, Rodney Eade's team was dreadful. In basketball and American football, it has long been said that "defence wins championships". And in the modern world of Australian football, with the proliferation of coaches and the emphasis on opposition scouting, it has come to be a truism as well.Of the past 15 premier teams only one, Denis Pagan's 1999 Kangaroos team, came from outside the top handful in defensive rankings, simply taken from the list of points scored against.The best teams simply don't allow big scores to be kicked against them. You don't have to be the best defensive team; just one of the best.DEFENSIVE RANKING2006 West Coast 42005 Sydney 22004 Port Adelaide 42003 Brisbane Lions 52002 Brisbane Lions 22001 Brisbane Lions 62000 Essendon 11999 Kangaroos 101998 Adelaide 11997 Adelaide 11996 North Melbourne 71995 Carlton 11994 West Coast 11993 Essendon 51992 West Coast 1As for Richmond:Attack: 14th - score an average of 83 points (1. Geelong 120; 16. Melbourne 76)Defence: 15th - concede an average of 120 points (1. West Coast 74; 16. Carlton 124)Full article at: http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/the-case-for-the-defence/2007/05/30/1180205337990.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1