Author Topic: Matt Burgan's review of Richmond's list (afl site)  (Read 672 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98248
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Matt Burgan's review of Richmond's list (afl site)
« on: March 19, 2008, 05:01:29 PM »
Flag form guide: Richmond
Matt Burgan
afl.com.au
11:52 AM Wed 19 March, 2008

Taking Geelong’s 2007 list as the benchmark, we’ll look at each team’s list while considering four key factors:

* Age
* Experience
* Height
* Key positions

Of course, we know other, less tangible factors influence a side’s succesor failure, such as injuries, suspensions, team stability, perhaps team spirit, and certainly the small matter of skill. But few of these can be reasonably assessed at the beginning of a year. What can be assessed, we’ll take a look at.


RICHMOND

BEST 25
B: Andrew Raines, Will Thursfield, Luke McGuane
HB: Joel Bowden, Graham Polak, Chris Newman
C: Jordan McMahon, Kane Johnson, Richard Tambling
HF: Brett Deledio, Jack Riewoldt, Kayne Pettifer
F: Nathan Brown, Matthew Richardson, Mitch Morton
FOLL: Troy Simmonds, Shane Tuck, Nathan Foley
I/C: Mark Coughlan, Adam Pattison, Daniel Jackson, Jake King
EMG: Dean Polo, Shane Edwards, Cleve Hughes

Main part of article at:
http://www.afl.com.au/News/NewsArticle/tabid/208/Default.aspx?newsId=56476

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Matt Burgan's review of Richmond's list (afl site)
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2008, 11:02:04 PM »
At least Matt Burgan has taken the time to review and analyse (unlike our mate Rohan Conmanelly).

The big thing for me that is not reviewed is the depth issue.  I can see only 2 players threatening the top 25 (Connors & Rance), so the quality of the list in terms of depth is really the big issue facing RFC which can only be solved over time and drafts.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Matt Burgan's review of Richmond's list (afl site)
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2008, 04:32:02 AM »
For some reason the link has changed. Here's the Tigers link:

http://www.afl.com.au/News/NewsArticle/tabid/208/Default.aspx?newsId=56556

True Darth. We still have a hole in our list in terms of 23-27 year olds. I don't see our depth genuinely improving until Lids and co. all hit their early-mid 20s.

Also the way Burgan breaks down the age brackets doesn't show in the 23-28 age group it's 20-10 in Geelong's favour (excluding rookies). 

Current ages 20/3/08:

Richmond

33: Richo
30: Brown, Johnson
29: Bowden, Simmonds
28: Tivendale
---------------------
27: -
26: Tuck, Pettifer
25: Coughlan, Hyde, Newman
24: McMahon, Moore, King
23: Polak, Howat#, Silvester#
22: Foley, Schulz, Raines, Pattison, Cartledge#
---------------------
21: Jackson, Meyer, Polo, Tambling, Thursfield, McGuane, Morton, Hughes
20: Casserly, Deledio, White, Graham, JON
19: Collins, Connors, Edwards, Riewoldt, Gourdis, Collard#
18: Rance, Putt
17: Cotchin

Geelong:

30: Milburn
29: Harley
28: Mooney, Scarlett, Ottens
-------------------------------
27: Wojcinski, Ling
26: Enright, Chapman, J.Hunt, Corey, D.Johnson, Rooke
25: -
24: Egan, S.Johnson, Bartel, Kelly, G.Ablett
23: Byrnes, Mackie, Lonergan, Stokes
22: Tenace, Davenport, Blake, Moles#
-------------------------------
21: Prismall, Taylor, Mumford#
20: Gamble, West
19: Djekkura, Hawkins, Hogan, Selwood, Varcoe, D.Simpson, Bedford# 
18: S.Simpson, Donohue, McKenna, Laidler#, Kangars#
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd