Porn star mcmahon. come on boys was he seriously necessary eff me dead
To answer that question it is needful to look at the circumstances on why he was recruited and what other alternatives there were.
I am under the impression that it was recognised at RFC that our rebound out of defence was slow and stilted. That this type of approach was giving opposition teams more opportunity to flood back and block our scoring opportunities. I think it was reliased that this was not going to move our club forward and that a quick, accurate rebounding defender was needed to boost our scoring and give our forwards every opportunity to get the ball cleanly.
Were there options within the club to fulfil this role. I dont think so, Raines would be the only other candidate and I think he falls a bit short in this role IMO.
Were there any other options outside the club for this role. Honestly I don't know but they made a decision that McMahon was the best available for the role, he is quick and I believe his disposal is good.
I believe the role was absolutely necessary but whether McMahon is the best for the role my jury is still out although I think at the present time he is. Of course we would all like our footballers heavily accountable and tougher but these attributes in an extreme go against the role McMahon was recruited for.