Author Topic: Terry Wallace / Danny Frawley  (Read 1061 times)

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5687
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Terry Wallace / Danny Frawley
« on: May 13, 2009, 04:20:26 PM »
I'll admit I feel for Terry Wallace, as die hard as I am I still like Terry including how unsuccessful we have been under him. Listening to Frawley speak on how he felt in his last few weeks of coaching it made me really feel for Wallace. Frawley said mentally coaching a team you know 100% you won't be coaching in a few weeks is degrading and emotionally shattering. Terry must be going through something similar. He must have been told he wont be coaching next year but we'll honor his contract to minimum Round 11 and then they will play it by year. Terry is stuck in the middle of the decision "Walk away" what's the point, whats to achieve? Or stay as you have promised not to repeat what happened at the Bulldogs.

Real tough for Terry he get's slaughtered in the media either way. To get approached with have you lost the passion for coaching is just way to raw for mine. Maybe I'm a Richmond tragic and forgive to easily but I feel for him. As a leader of a football club I can't understand that the future of Terry could have been handled extremely better. I would have thought one of three options were possible:

A) State that he will be coach till the end of the year regardless of however many games we win or lose and a review will take place after the last competitive game.

B) State that this will be Terry's last year on his contract and they would be looking for a new coach and interviewing candidates throughout the year and a caretaker coach will be employeed unless Wallace has the desire to coach the team out.

C) Extending Wallace's contract, take the heat off performance for the year and have Wallace plan for his last year, collectively tanking.

Leaving it in limbo saying they will review it mid year and who knows what they will do is a horrible way of doing business and for mine should have been handled better for Wallace's sake and for the clubs. It's a asoft out answering no questions and just buying time until they woudl have to answer the media.

Lastly, once thing that doesn't get spoken about which hurt us. In rebuilding the last 5 years we were really hurt with the game changing significantly 2 years ago with zones and offensive pressure. Wallace rebuilt the list with running players to counter act the flood that can run and carry the ball quickly and quicker than the opposition can flood. Unfortunately that game plan is useless now as the game has changed, that's just football I suppose.
Go Tigers!

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Terry Wallace / Danny Frawley
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2009, 05:31:45 PM »
you must be watching different games cause Wallace aint ever had a game plan, l think Frawley left his old ones in the cabinet as skills & moving the ball have not changed
dont feel sorry for any of them

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Terry Wallace / Danny Frawley
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 03:20:59 AM »
I'll take Frawley over Wallace as coach.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58594
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Terry Wallace / Danny Frawley
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2009, 08:01:55 PM »
I'd like to know why it takes a whole 12 months to do a review of the football department especially when this review has run from the middle of last season to middle of this season. Geelong finished their review within 6 weeks from the end of the season (2006) to the trade period so final decisions and any changes were confirmed and made outside the season so it didn't interfer with the football team.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Terry Wallace / Danny Frawley
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2009, 01:54:10 AM »
I'd like to know why it takes a whole 12 months to do a review of the football department especially when this review has run from the middle of last season to middle of this season. Geelong finished their review within 6 weeks from the end of the season (2006) to the trade period so final decisions and any changes were confirmed and made outside the season so it didn't interfer with the football team.

Reasonable question MT.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Terry Wallace / Danny Frawley
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2009, 06:35:50 AM »
I'd like to know why it takes a whole 12 months to do a review of the football department especially when this review has run from the middle of last season to middle of this season. Geelong finished their review within 6 weeks from the end of the season (2006) to the trade period so final decisions and any changes were confirmed and made outside the season so it didn't interfer with the football team.

Depends on a lot of circumstances and realities I suppose.  Maybe there were 2 reviews - the self-educating one that Tony Free did and the one the club always intended to do - 12 months apart but blurred into one by media laziness/ignorance.  Or maybe the club broke it into elements over a longer period to cater for time constraints on the personnel involved in it.  Or maybe it was staged to allow changes to be made in certain areas then re-assessed in time before completion.  Or maybe the board/personnel don't have a clue.  Who knows, but I'm happy the club are not going to bow to popular pressure in thinking that a review must take any length of time - short or long.  A review should be finished when you are satisfied you have all the information you need to make sound decisions for the future and if it takes 1 week, 1 month or 1 year then so be it.  Better than rushing it and getting a sub-standard outcome.