Author Topic: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)  (Read 1403 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100503
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« on: June 07, 2009, 04:56:49 AM »
Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable
Caroline Wilson | June 7, 2009

THE MOST telling assessment of Terry Wallace's failure at Richmond probably came in the departed coach's own highlights reel, one he edited at his farewell press conference in the Richmond Social Club six days ago.

Wallace singled out his decision to move Matthew Richardson onto a wing in 2008, a tactical masterstroke which gave the football public one of last season's great spectacles and almost saw Richo win a Brownlow. Almost — but not quite — a recurring theme in Wallace's coaching career.

His second highlight involved Ben Cousins and his decision to give the disgraced champion another chance. Both worthy moves involving individual stars, one of whom is 34, the other who turns 31 later this month.

In terms of the Richmond Football Club, a place Wallace insists is better than when he arrived almost five years ago, the outgoing coach significantly did not discuss any young players in his Tiger highlights.

Wallace said he left recruiting to the recruiters but it could not be said that he, as a coach, could yet boast having overseen the fully successful development of any of the club's high draft picks in his time. That is with the possible exception Trent Cotchin.

But Wallace is gone now and few at Punt Road seemed sorry to see him go. Clearly the club believes its unreliable and generally insipid playing group is better off completing the desperately disappointing 2009 under the guidance of Coburg's coach of one-and-a-half seasons Jade Rawlings than the highly experienced Wallace.

The players largely like and rate Rawlings — he is also Richo's brother-in-law — which is not necessarily the reason he got the job. The Tigers board and executive have no reason to succumb in any way to a playing group it plans to cull as savagely as is possible under the AFL system.

The fact is the club does not believe Wayne Campbell is ready to become a senior coach. He is seen as still having too many flaws in his coaching make-up although those flaws are not considered insurmountable. Just as Campbell was highly regarded by the Western Bulldogs, a club which nonetheless privately regards its assistant Leon Cameron as a more complete coach-in-waiting.

Rawlings has coached his own team and the transition in the minds of the Richmond chiefs should prove smoother with assistants Campbell and David King retaining their roles and expected to pursue senior coaching positions. Craig McRae will be looked at to take over at Coburg.

Wallace's future is less certain. Despite strong speculation early in the week he appears to have never been in the mix for a senior football position at the Gold Coast although, like many who have mixed media and football commitments, the media no longer looms as the cash cow it was.

He probably conducted at least one too many interviews over the past week, interviews which seemed more and more to sound like job applications, particularly when Monday's outlining of his curriculum vitae going way back to Wallace's marketing role at Sky Channel would have been more than enough.

In isolation The Footy Show grilling — the result of a financial deal struck some weeks ago before Wallace was finally moved out of Tigerland — did not hurt him in terms of Richmond because no one would have thanked him for revealing all the details of the Chris Newman confrontation and he has been steadfast in his support of the current administration.

It is well known that Sydney compensated Wallace financially but, again, there has been no expectation of that ever being confirmed by either party and his dodging of that question was not surprising.

No, Wallace's big mistake was to give his watered-down version of the Bulldogs departure, a version hotly denied by the club itself which, since Friday night has seemed happy enough to point to the scoreboard.

Our understanding is that he never shook hands with David Smorgon and Campbell Rose at that fateful Monday meeting — they were stunned when he said he could take the club no further —and in fact drove away from the club the following day without saying goodbye to either man after one of his leadership group tipped him off that the players did not want him to coach the final game of season 2002.

So to suggest otherwise only diluted Monday's apology, which appeared to all who heard it totally sincere.

It is too easy to say that Wallace was badly advised. He is a grown man after all.

It was clear on Friday night that Richmond and Bulldogs supporters had mostly moved on from Wallace. In the coming days the Tigers board will ratify the coaching sub-committee, which will spread the net far and wide in finding his replacement, with Rawlings clearly only a caretaker at this stage.

The Gary March board and its administration — clearly being led in football terms by Craig Cameron and not Steve Wright — can rightly blame others for the failure of Wallace which, of course, is not Wallace's alone but which has destroyed his coaching career. This next decision and the restructure and rebuilding that accompanies it will be their true test.

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/wallaces-tigers-insipid/2009/06/06/1244234424290.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2009, 01:35:29 PM »
Sounds like Caro has turned on Wallace  ??? Gloves are off now that he is no longer a Richmond person.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2009, 11:18:53 PM »
The Board isn't innocent in all this either although they did inherit a club from Casey with a $4m debt, a $2m operating loss and few resources. The direction of the Club should come from the Board and that includes deciding the direction to rebuild the list properly and then employing people to implement this direction. Now with Miller there it would have been difficult given he was a man wearing a 1000 hats as recruiter as well as being on the Board but since he's gone we have still made the same recruiting mistakes (trading picks away for fringe players). You would've thought when the new footy manager was being hired one of the stipulations would've been no trading away picks while we are rebuilding. Cameron was made Wallace's superior. March was also promising finals six months out from the start of this season  :P.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2009, 08:57:41 AM »
The Board isn't innocent in all this either although they did inherit a club from Casey with a $4m debt, a $2m operating loss and few resources. The direction of the Club should come from the Board and that includes deciding the direction to rebuild the list properly and then employing people to implement this direction. Now with Miller there it would have been difficult given he was a man wearing a 1000 hats as recruiter as well as being on the Board but since he's gone we have still made the same recruiting mistakes (trading picks away for fringe players). You would've thought when the new footy manager was being hired one of the stipulations would've been no trading away picks while we are rebuilding. Cameron was made Wallace's superior. March was also promising finals six months out from the start of this season  :P.

we agree once again.  ;)
Cameron mighten be the man capable either ;)

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2009, 09:06:02 AM »
The Board isn't innocent in all this either although they did inherit a club from Casey with a $4m debt, a $2m operating loss and few resources. The direction of the Club should come from the Board and that includes deciding the direction to rebuild the list properly and then employing people to implement this direction. Now with Miller there it would have been difficult given he was a man wearing a 1000 hats as recruiter as well as being on the Board but since he's gone we have still made the same recruiting mistakes (trading picks away for fringe players). You would've thought when the new footy manager was being hired one of the stipulations would've been no trading away picks while we are rebuilding. Cameron was made Wallace's superior. March was also promising finals six months out from the start of this season  :P.

we agree once again.  ;)
Cameron mighten be the man capable either ;)

do you think we are in the market for a director of football jack?

I would be shocked if that happenned.


Edit: fixed quoting
« Last Edit: June 08, 2009, 10:02:40 PM by one-eyed »

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2009, 09:10:29 AM »
all I am saying is that camerons first six months havent been flash.
I crindged when I seen his press confernence with Newy , it wasnt good. Might as well come out and tell the truth ,than try and put spin onto it , considering the someone had leaked it to the press anyway. that person aint there anymore ;)

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2009, 09:19:28 AM »
terry the blabbermouth is gone ....finally

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9826
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2009, 01:28:29 PM »
Is it absolutely imperative then to do all possible to get Balme at the club?
I have only heard wonderful things, recently even Eddie was singing his praises on his contribution to the club when Collingwood was in trouble. He is a vault when it comes to club talk, just what we need down there with all the leaks.

First of all is he still available?
Second, What is the role of Tony Free?
Third, Is Anthony Mithen still on the Board and WHY?




The club that keeps giving.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Wallace's Tigers: insipid, unreliable (Caro in the Age)
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2009, 11:50:24 PM »
Yep Mitho is still on the Board. With his media background maybe he'll take some credit for all the publicity the Club has got in the past 6 months lol.

all I am saying is that camerons first six months havent been flash.
I crindged when I seen his press confernence with Newy , it wasnt good. Might as well come out and tell the truth ,than try and put spin onto it , considering the someone had leaked it to the press anyway. that person aint there anymore ;)
Didn't the Club give Cameron a 5-year contract?  :-\
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd