Author Topic: Mitch Farmer  (Read 25356 times)

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #90 on: May 23, 2010, 12:41:57 PM »
That fumble in the second when metres in the clear was shocking. He even had three go's at it before the Essendon player forced a throw in such was the time he had available to him. Shocking bit of play. >:(

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #91 on: May 23, 2010, 01:47:32 PM »
That fumble in the second when metres in the clear was shocking. He even had three go's at it before the Essendon player forced a throw in such was the time he had available to him. Shocking bit of play. >:(

ive seen more than enough Tucker  :chuck :chuck  His constant fumbles on at least 4 occasions when no one was around him was enough for me to safely say he is rubbish.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #92 on: May 23, 2010, 01:53:23 PM »
He's still only played 10 AFL games

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #93 on: May 23, 2010, 01:58:13 PM »
He's still only played 10 AFL games

That's a cop out Infamy.

Skills, running to position, age, smaller body, adjusting to the pace of a game can affect a player early in his career but fumbling the way he does when in the clear in unacceptable. You can still be short of brains and still play the game effectively but if your hands are letting you down well then that's another issue Infamy.

I'm not going to say I hope he improves all I'm saying what he dished up last night was unacceptable and his hit on Hurley is probably a bi product of where he is at currently in his mind regarding his footy.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #94 on: May 23, 2010, 02:05:48 PM »
He's still only played 10 AFL games

Nason has played less and is more of a player than Farmer. The sole reason for recruiting him was to stop little Milne type forwards that destroy us every year, and with Farmer i am not confident at all when he goes near the ball nor stopping the small forward types.

Another rubbish draft selection we could've done without.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #95 on: May 23, 2010, 02:28:37 PM »
He's still only played 10 AFL games

Nason has played less and is more of a player than Farmer. The sole reason for recruiting him was to stop little Milne type forwards that destroy us every year, and with Farmer i am not confident at all when he goes near the ball nor stopping the small forward types.

Another rubbish draft selection we could've done without.
He wasn't a draft selection you drop kick, we got him for getting rid of Schulz, which you wanted
Plus we got the draft pick that got us Nason

FFS :banghead

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #96 on: May 23, 2010, 02:45:33 PM »
He's still only played 10 AFL games

Nason has played less and is more of a player than Farmer. The sole reason for recruiting him was to stop little Milne type forwards that destroy us every year, and with Farmer i am not confident at all when he goes near the ball nor stopping the small forward types.

Another rubbish draft selection we could've done without.
He wasn't a draft selection you drop kick, we got him for getting rid of Schulz, which you wanted
Plus we got the draft pick that got us Nason

FFS :banghead

i know exactly what he was you dumb stuff and you can word it whichever way you want if it makes you feel better. But his selection prevents us picking up another kid from the draft so thats a waste IMO.

Farmer is not much better than Schulz believe me. 
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5403
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #97 on: May 23, 2010, 02:46:36 PM »
He's still only played 10 AFL games

Nason has played less and is more of a player than Farmer. The sole reason for recruiting him was to stop little Milne type forwards that destroy us every year, and with Farmer i am not confident at all when he goes near the ball nor stopping the small forward types.

Another rubbish draft selection we could've done without.
He wasn't a draft selection you drop kick, we got him for getting rid of Schulz, which you wanted
Plus we got the draft pick that got us Nason

FFS :banghead
Shot down! That kind of factual post making is not welcome here :lol

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5403
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #98 on: May 23, 2010, 02:50:10 PM »
He's still only played 10 AFL games

Nason has played less and is more of a player than Farmer. The sole reason for recruiting him was to stop little Milne type forwards that destroy us every year, and with Farmer i am not confident at all when he goes near the ball nor stopping the small forward types.

Another rubbish draft selection we could've done without.
He wasn't a draft selection you drop kick, we got him for getting rid of Schulz, which you wanted
Plus we got the draft pick that got us Nason

FFS :banghead

i know exactly what he was you dumb eff and you can word it whichever way you want if it makes you feel better. But his selection prevents us picking up another kid from the draft so thats a waste IMO.

Farmer is not much better than Schulz believe me. 
How, exactly did his trade stop us from drafting a young player? BTW Mitch Farmer is still young! We still ended up with the same amount of draft picks that we had before the trade period! Not certain we could have got a decent pick for Shulz on its own!

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #99 on: May 23, 2010, 03:13:26 PM »
I havent seen much to get too enthused about Farmer, too often he fumbles under pressure be it implied or physical, no bloody way should he be in the team ahead of polo..in any case he'll get at least 2 weeks for the elbow to the head
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #100 on: May 23, 2010, 09:25:35 PM »
not good

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #101 on: May 23, 2010, 09:31:40 PM »
Hardwick said you won't be playing in the team if you can't win your own ball.

.....See ya Farmer.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #102 on: June 04, 2010, 11:56:11 PM »
LMAO at how slow farmer is off the mark. As soon as the sheerin is in hands i have visions of a white version of JON.

Milne was streets ahead of him when he played on him, and surely we cant persist with him. He has played one descent game all year(last week)

seen enough

hack
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Siberian

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #103 on: June 04, 2010, 11:58:50 PM »
agree, he is just not up to it :( cant beat his man

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #104 on: June 05, 2010, 12:08:27 AM »
Milne towelled up Thursfield too so Farmer wasn't alone on this. If anything he had to cover for another players failure.

That being said, I don't know what Farmer was doing playing 7-8 meters off Milne... not smart.