Author Topic: Mitch Farmer  (Read 25353 times)

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #105 on: June 05, 2010, 12:10:20 AM »
Poor again.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #106 on: June 05, 2010, 12:26:11 AM »
The guy is useless!!!!

I just hope he doesn't become the coaches pet. It will like Frawley/Fiora or Wallace/shultz all over again. :banghead
The club that keeps giving.

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #107 on: June 05, 2010, 01:23:36 AM »
poofter version of leon cameron.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5339
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #108 on: June 05, 2010, 01:47:50 AM »
mitch farmer, ben mason, shane edwards are too small

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #109 on: June 05, 2010, 03:02:10 AM »
mitch farmer, ben mason, shane edwards are too small

I don't know how many times this needs to be disproved, but it has nothing to do with size, it's about quality

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #110 on: June 05, 2010, 08:52:14 AM »
mitch farmer, ben mason, shane edwards are too small

I don't know how many times this needs to be disproved, but it has nothing to do with size, it's about quality

That is the bottom line.  Despite that it is often the small forwards that tear us a new one, some keep sprouting this line.

All three of the players mentioned by torch are taller than Milne, so does that mean he is too small too?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #111 on: June 05, 2010, 08:56:07 AM »
mitch farmer, ben mason, shane edwards are too small

I don't know how many times this needs to be disproved, but it has nothing to do with size, it's about quality

how many clubs play with the size of Nason, King, Nahas, White, Farmer, Edwards all in the one team. not many im guessing.

too many of the same in 1 team. open your eyes and you will see it too. It wasnt wet like last week it was a dry ground and we played too small.

FLMAO at Farmer replacing Schulz on our list. Schulz is actually a better player.lol

i call Farmer footsteps as every time he touched the ball he fumbles like someone who is going to bend him over from behind and pound his sorry arse

little sissy. Dimma drop him and put us out of our misery
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #112 on: June 05, 2010, 08:57:55 AM »
mitch farmer, ben mason, shane edwards are too small

Would agree.
Seen Nason get crunched a ripper by Del Santo last night ( who is hardly a tough player )

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #113 on: June 05, 2010, 01:09:18 PM »
mitch farmer, ben mason, shane edwards are too small

Would agree.
Seen Nason get crunched a ripper by Del Santo last night ( who is hardly a tough player )

add king to that list as well. with tambling in the side ... its way to small.

edwards is improving and has put on some size and tambling should be the only midgets in the side, if we need a 3rd Nason should play ahead of Nahaaaaaa  ;D

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #114 on: June 05, 2010, 01:25:24 PM »
mitch farmer, ben mason, shane edwards are too small

I don't know how many times this needs to be disproved, but it has nothing to do with size, it's about quality

how many clubs play with the size of Nason, King, Nahas, White, Farmer, Edwards all in the one team. not many im guessing.

Byrnes, Stokes, Chapman, Wojinski, Ablett, Selwood.

Bateman, Hooper, Brown, Rioli, Osbourne, Mitchell, Sewell.

Betts, Joseph, Murphy, Yarran, Garlett, Armfield.

Campbell, Harvey, Garlett, Adams, Ross, Urquhart, Wells, Thomas

Montagna, Milne, McQualter, Scheider, Baker.


I can't be stuffed going through the rest but there are 5 teams that suggest we are pretty close to the same amount of "midgets" playing as anyone else.

It's about body size and quality that gets us at the moment because of where our list is at.
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #115 on: June 05, 2010, 08:40:43 PM »
Milne stats:

kicks 16, handballs 5, marks contested 2,  marks uncontested 9, tackles 3, clearences 3, goals 5.


Farmer stats:

poo himself 15, unaccountable 9, soft 21, shephards 0, tackles 1.

1 tackle 2 weeks in a row is consistant I say!  :thumbsup
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #116 on: June 05, 2010, 08:46:00 PM »
Milne stats:

kicks 16, handballs 5, marks contested 2,  marks uncontested 9, tackles 3, clearences 3, goals 5.


Farmer stats:

poo himself 15, unaccountable 9, soft 21, shephards 0, tackles 1.

1 tackle 2 weeks in a row is consistant I say!  :thumbsup
To be fair, Farmer only played on Milne for some of the 2nd half
Thursfield was on him in the first half and got smashed also

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #117 on: June 05, 2010, 08:53:57 PM »
well im going to go against the grain and openly state I've seen a few good signs from farmer the past 2 weeks and think long term he'll make it. Hasnt been impressive to date, but just the way he selflessly and naturally leaves his man to be a chop out, his hardness has impressed me and his kicking seems more to be a confidence thing bc mechanically it looks ok to me and he can really roost it. Got to remember hes only played about 10 or so games so hes going to have that "rabbit in headlights" look about him for another 20 or so games. Reckon he'll be ok

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7011
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #118 on: June 05, 2010, 09:42:06 PM »
well im going to go against the grain and openly state I've seen a few good signs from farmer the past 2 weeks and think long term he'll make it. Hasnt been impressive to date, but just the way he selflessly and naturally leaves his man to be a chop out, his hardness has impressed me and his kicking seems more to be a confidence thing bc mechanically it looks ok to me and he can really roost it. Got to remember hes only played about 10 or so games so hes going to have that "rabbit in headlights" look about him for another 20 or so games. Reckon he'll be ok
I agree with you 100%.  I think he has looked really good at times.  He has set up some great plays too, some good drive out of defence and attack further up the field.  He will only get better.  People are judging him like a player who has been around for years, he is pretty new at this level.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond
« Reply #119 on: June 05, 2010, 10:22:08 PM »
well im going to go against the grain and openly state I've seen a few good signs from farmer the past 2 weeks and think long term he'll make it. Hasnt been impressive to date, but just the way he selflessly and naturally leaves his man to be a chop out, his hardness has impressed me and his kicking seems more to be a confidence thing bc mechanically it looks ok to me and he can really roost it. Got to remember hes only played about 10 or so games so hes going to have that "rabbit in headlights" look about him for another 20 or so games. Reckon he'll be ok
I agree with you 100%.  I think he has looked really good at times.  He has set up some great plays too, some good drive out of defence and attack further up the field.  He will only get better.  People are judging him like a player who has been around for years, he is pretty new at this level.
you guys crack me up. He isn't hard, he isn't impressive and he hasn't looked good. He looks scared and nervous. He doesn't shepherd nor does he tackle enough. Send him to Coburg until he can actually do the things you write. The guy is just a younger version of another overated hack...... Hislop.
The club that keeps giving.