will we finish higher then the dee's

[TigerTimeII]

Podsiadly

pods is ok, but hey anyone can look good in that geelong team

imagine pods at our club, poo no1 draft picks cant even look good 4 us , pods would be crap in our team

[Judge Roughneck]

would rather Pods @ FF than Rance

[TigerTimeII]

would rather Pods @ FF than Rance

rance will be gone next yr and is not our ff

griffiths will be and is better than pods

[Judge Roughneck]

Rance was rated as a top 10 pick in the '07 draft. Delisted him would be another poor move by Richmond.

Griffs is 10 years younger than Pods. not sure if u can compare the 2

[big tone]

The draft was put into place to even up the comp. With us finishing  last this year we are entitled to pick 1 just like Melbourne last year and teams before them. Sure we have f@#ked up in the past with picks but that is beside the point. The rules since the draft came in is the bottom team gets first pick. (simply put) The AFL wants new teams in the AFL not us, we have the worst list and should be given the same oppotunities other struggling clubs have had before us when finishing bottom.

[WA Tiger]

The draft was put into place to even up the comp. With us finishing  last this year we are entitled to pick 1 just like Melbourne last year and teams before them. Sure we have f@#ked up in the past with picks but that is beside the point. The rules since the draft came in is the bottom team gets first pick. (simply put) The AFL wants new teams in the AFL not us, we have the worst list and should be given the same oppotunities other struggling clubs have had before us when finishing bottom.

Thank the good Lord, finally someone that understands what I was getting at.......

[jackstar is back again]

Rance was rated as a top 10 pick in the '07 draft. Delisted him would be another poor move by Richmond.

Griffs is 10 years younger than Pods. not sure if u can compare the 2

Sorry, but Rance will be out the door

[WA Tiger]

Rance was rated as a top 10 pick in the '07 draft. Delisted him would be another poor move by Richmond.

Griffs is 10 years younger than Pods. not sure if u can compare the 2

Sorry, but Rance will be out the door

Well I hope he stays, look at how Rains a Rodan have ended up and I didn't wan't to see either of them go. We can't keep just getting rid of these young players. Rance and Rodan were unlucky with injuries, they got their bodies right and gee do we need them now, lets hope we dont have to say the same about YOUNG Rance.

[Judge Roughneck]

The draft was put into place to even up the comp. With us finishing  last this year we are entitled to pick 1 just like Melbourne last year and teams before them. Sure we have f@#ked up in the past with picks but that is beside the point. The rules since the draft came in is the bottom team gets first pick. (simply put) The AFL wants new teams in the AFL not us, we have the worst list and should be given the same oppotunities other struggling clubs have had before us when finishing bottom.

Thank the good Lord, finally someone that understands what I was getting at.......

Problem is what you are getting at is misguided.

the AFL is not going to award charity picks to Richmond for being poohouse.

the club should have tanked over the last 5-6 years instead of waiting for 2010.

[tigersalive]

Rance was rated as a top 10 pick in the '07 draft. Delisted him would be another poor move by Richmond.

Griffs is 10 years younger than Pods. not sure if u can compare the 2

Sorry, but Rance will be out the door

Sorry but Rance has another year left on his contract.  Are we going to pay him out?

[Judge Roughneck]

Would be better served seeing if he gets any better IMO over the next two seasons.

Still young for a KPP

[tiger till i die]

The draft was put into place to even up the comp. With us finishing  last this year we are entitled to pick 1 just like Melbourne last year and teams before them. Sure we have f@#ked up in the past with picks but that is beside the point. The rules since the draft came in is the bottom team gets first pick. (simply put) The AFL wants new teams in the AFL not us, we have the worst list and should be given the same oppotunities other struggling clubs have had before us when finishing bottom.

Thank the good Lord, finally someone that understands what I was getting at.......

Problem is what you are getting at is misguided.

the AFL is not going to award charity picks to Richmond for being poohouse.

the club should have tanked over the last 5-6 years instead of waiting for 2010.

Correct Bentleigh-esque.. people seem to be pretending that some how the AFL will save a dead club but there wrong!! no offence .. the new clubs always need another club to beat in the season to get supporters and on there side

[Judge Roughneck]

stuff Melbourne. 37 goals

[Eat_em_Alive]

Geelong defeated melbourne
37.11. 233
7.5. 47

Well what could anyone say?? I feel sorry for them to be honest but then again........ Theyre supporters are priks

[WA Tiger]

Just seen this score and honestly thought it wa a misprint...bloody hell...what was the record that the Cats nearly did us by but never did..have they done it this time??