Ironically Vickery leaving hurts us more than if Dusty did.
Sorry, what?
We would get an early first round pick for Dusty, first round pick at the very worst if he left as a FA next year.
We spent pick 8 on Vickery, put years of development into him and we're getting a 2nd round pick back - AND feeling good about it.
That's what I mean.
Okay so where is the explanation where it hurts us more? Or are you trying to say we could get a better player than Dusty with another 1st round pick but we are unlikely to upgrade on Vickery with a 2nd round pick?
Alright
We spent an early first rounder on Dusty. WORST CASE SCENARIO he signs on elsewhere as a free agent and we get a first round selection as compo. Worst case. First rounder for first rounder.
Vickery, whom we spent our first rounder on (pick 8, 2008) and spent years developing, signs on elsewhere,for which we get a 2nd Round pick as compo (and we're jumping for joy at the value we get out of that deal!).
So what I'm saying is that Vickery leaving leaves us with a second round pick - which is far less than what we paid - whilst Dusty leaving leaves us with a good chance of a like-for-like compensation.
You dig?